Please don't get too hung up on the marks given for ability and resume, they're just guidelines, I'm not working on some formula where "A+ + A- = overall A", because obviously there are more factors to take into account than just those two. Those two are the major ones of course, and I personally value resume a little bit more highly of the two (which helped me to work out the ordering of GSP, Big Nog and Anderson, as those three are pretty much neck-and-neck IMO). Anyway, looking forward to hearing comments on the placings. The only one I really, really struggled with was whether to have Hughes or Crocop at 10th, but in the end I think Hughes was more dominant/consistent and had better career accomplishments. I'm ready to hear a valid counter-argument though! And a pre-emptive apology to Bill Butcher for placing Sakuraba behind Penn and Wanderlei! :good This content is protected Ability: A-, Resume: A- Comment: It took a long time to decide who deserved 10th position between Hughes and Crocop. Eventually, I went with Hughes because of his greater career accomplishments. 9 wins in UFC title fights including wins over GSP, Penn, Sherk, Trigg, Newton and Sakurai. Excellent wrestler who finished fights, #2 ww ever after GSP. Only lost to ATGs in his prime (GSP and Penn). This content is protected Ability: A-, Resume: B Comment: Much like Saku, Hendo spent his prime fighting a lot of bigger men. Mixing wrestling skills with power-punching, Henderson beat a young Big Nog, as well as Wanderlei Silva, Vitor Belfort, Franklin, Bisping, Babalu and Yvel. Even after some disappointing late-career performances (Shields, Jackson), Hendo has rebounded to become Strikeforce lhw champion, showing great longevity. This content is protected Ability: A, Resume: B+ Comment: Made 4 successful defences of UFC lightheavyweight title from 2005-2006, a record still to be beaten. Only men to defeat him in his prime were top guys Randy Couture and Rampage Jackson. Used great takedown defence and vicious striking to defeat Couture twice, Tito Ortiz twice, Randleman, Belfort, Horn, Overeem and Babalu. This content is protected Ability: A, Resume: B Comment: Managed to achieve remarkable success despite spending most of his career fighting bigger men. Opened his career fighting Kimo Leopoldo (60lbs heavier than him), and fought with that same spirit throughout the decade. Effectively wiped out the Gracie family in Pride (beating Royce and submitting Renzo), and had great wins over Rampage Jackson, Vitor Belfort, Kevin Randleman and Carlos Newton among others. Between 1996 and 2010, he won 19 fights by submission, and lost 0 by submission. This content is protected Ability: A, Resume: A- Comment: Long unbeaten run as Pride MW champion, the baddest non-hw in the baddest era in MMA. Brilliant wins over prime Rampage Jackson, Dan Henderson, Kazushi Sakuraba and Ricardo Arona. Also, was fearless enough to fight hw's like Crocop and Fujita, and perform well. This content is protected Ability: A+, Resume: A- Comment: One of only two men to ever win titles in 2 different UFC weight classes, sub win over long-reigning dominant ww champ Matt Hughes is one of the best mma wins ever. Top wins are Hughes, Gomi, Sherk and Pulver, performed very well at ww in 1st GSP fight and vs Fitch. This content is protected Ability: A++, Resume: A- Comment: Potentially the greatest of all-time in terms of peak ability, exceptional Muay Thai offensive arsenal and deceptively good BJJ. Only reason he is #4 is due to comparative thinness of resume compared to top 3. Best wins are Henderson, Franklin x2, Sonnen and Belfort. This content is protected Ability: A, Resume: A+ Comment: Big Nog often looked like the poorer fighter in the ring, only to pull out the victory. Superb BJJ, developed excellent boxing skills as well. Extremely strong resume boasting wins over Cro-cop, Barnett, Coleman, Sapp, Kharitonov, Werdum, etc. This content is protected Ability: A+, Resume: A+ Comment: Recovered from early championship setbacks to become extremely dominant. Great wrestler, great kickboxer, hardly ever loses rounds. Stellar wins over Hughes, Penn, Fitch, and more. This content is protected Ability: A++, Resume: A Comment: 10-year undefeated run, beat #2 hw of all-time Nogueira and #3 hw of all-time Crocop, longtime Pride #1 heavyweight. Great finisher of fights, very strong mentally. Peerless. Best of the rest: This content is protected (#11), This content is protected (#12) Honourable mentions: Randy Couture, Rampage Jackson :bbb:bbb:bbb
I believe Tito has the record for most defences of the UFC LHW belt, but other than that I can't see anything I'd disagree with, great list :good.
Cheers :good I meant that no-one since Liddell has beaten his record for defences, I see now I phrased it wrongly, it looks like I'm saying Liddell set the all-time record for defences, my bad.
Really good list. Hughes is a bit low for me personally, maybe put him at 8 and move the other two down.
You could be right actually. For me the top 7 picked themselves, and then I struggled with the last 3 places. On reflection, Hughes was more consistent/dominant than Chuck or Hendo. Yeah, if I'd to rewrite the list I think I'd do what you said. The only guys to beat prime Hughes were GSP and Penn, who were (imo) better than the Randy and Rampage that beat Chuck and Silva/Arona/L'il Nog/Misaki who beat Hendo. Now I'm writing, I'm thinking I should have Hughes #8, Hendo #9 and Chuck #10! **** it. :nut
I love Fedor as much as anyone, dude is a monster to say the least, but he is not a more technical fighter then half the people on that list (nor was he ever). Part of it is due to him being a heavyweight but plain and simple the, "A++" ability is a drastic overstatement relative to other fighters listed.
The dude was (and still is) unrivalled as the greatest heavyweight of all time, and he went nearly 10 years as the inarguable number 1 fighter in the world. Recent decline aside, his ability can not be overstated. His fights may not always have looked pretty, but he was demolishing the greatest heavyweights in the sport with incredible consistency.
Nah. There's a distinct difference between "technical ability" and "overall ability". You are thinking of the former, but I am thinking of the latter. "Technical ability" refers to discipline credentials and the aesthetic merits of their style. "Overall ability" refers to the actual effectiveness of the fighter in MMA competition. This all sounds a bit wooly, but the difference is very distinct. Example: Andrei Arlovski had technically better boxing than Fedor, but Fedor knocked him out in a round, because he was overall the better stand-up fighter. Technical proficiency is not the only thing that matters, all other attributes must be taken into consideration when evaluating overall ability. Crocop also had better technical striking skills than Fedor, yet Fedor outpointed him in a mostly stand-up fight. This is because overall Fedor is the superior fighter, although you can argue Crocop was technically better.