Do you think Tyson was better than Foreman?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Infern0, Jan 7, 2009.


  1. ralphc

    ralphc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,352
    0
    Jan 11, 2007
    Which is better dogs or cats? Tyson or Foreman? Open your eyes and see that they are different!
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    As a fighter?Probably
    In terms of accomplishments?No.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,142
    25,329
    Jan 3, 2007
    Well let's compare:

    MIKE TYSON

    1. Youngest heavyweight champion in the history of the sport

    2. Two time titlist

    3. 9 title defences

    4. Best wins - Michael Spinks, Pinklon Thomas, Trevor Berbick, Tony Tucker, Razor Ruddock, Frank Bruno.

    5. Final record - 50-6-44


    GEORGE FOREMAN

    1. Olympic Gold Medalist

    2. Two time heavyweight champ

    3. Oldest man to ever win the heavyweight title

    4. Highest win/ko ratio of any lineal champion

    5. Best wins, Joe Frazier, Ken Norton, Ron Lyle, Michael Moorer.

    6. Final record - 76-5-68


    Conclusion: I would probably rate Tyson a tad higher due to his more dominant performance as a champion and more victories over rated opposition earlier in his career. Foreman however, would have my vote to beat him head to head due to stylistic reasons.
    CONCLUSION
     
  4. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008

    Any Foreman beats any Tyson. But young Foreman (say, on the day he beat Norton) annihilates any Tyson. I'm thinking second row. First round, but second row.
     
  5. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    If it's prime Foreman vs prime Tyson, I give the decision to Tyson. Remember, in his prime, Tyson was extremely defensive. He would get in close, bobbing and weaving, throwing rapid body shots, stalking first the body to bring the guard down, and then, when the time was right, throw a head shot. Prime Tyson would be too quick and smart for Prime Foreman.
     
  6. 11player

    11player Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,167
    385
    Sep 19, 2007
    IMO, prime Tyson beats prime Foreman H2H.

    Career wise, Foreman probably acomplished a tad more.

    Although both are ATG and incredible talents, both underachieved, if you'd ask me.
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006

    Bull****. Foreman fought a handful of great/tough fighters in part 1 of his career surrounded by an assload of guys who didn't even have winning records or had just a handful of fights. Tyson fought more good fighters, even though George has the better names at the top.
     
  8. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    In terms of skill? Yes, Tyson was far superior. Head to head though I think Foreman would bully and batter him.
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Prime for prime? Yes despite of what Cus D'Matio might have placed in Tyson's head. Tyson would have won a prime for prime match up. Foreman might have hit harder than Tyson but he left him self wide open to be hit. Tyson while simmiler to Frazier and Marchino was bigger stronger and faster. He also had a defense that would allow him to avoide Foreman's punches while landing shots of his own.
    In the mid 90's when their bout might have taken place Tyson had become less of the defensive talant that along with his power made him "The Baddest Man On the Planet". And Foreman's defense had improved. Both could still hit.
    I slightly favor Tyson but it could go either way.
     
  10. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    The youngest HW champion vs. the oldest. Very interesting matchup head to head. Tough call right there, I mean when exactly was Forman's "prime"? Was it the early Forman or the later Forman? In terms of accomplishments I'd have to go with Big George, but head to head is a tougher call.
     
  11. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006
    I think any version of Foreman would beat prime Tyson.
     
  12. nabisko

    nabisko Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    tyson wins i think easily...foreman had more power but ali exposed that power as coming from wide looping shots..something a prime cus d'amato coached tyson would have easily dismantled..that being said i think this fight is over early either way..the older george foreman i dont think stands a chance..only if your as dumb as micheal moorer and you wanna stand right in front of him.
     
  13. Danny

    Danny Guest


    You can't even call it a ringwalk. Tyson was a guy that just wanted to get in the ring asap & get it on. He was not one for the bright lights, razmatazz & all that.

    Butch Lewis thought he was being smart when he tried to wind Mike up in the dressing room prior to the bout. However, Lewis soon knew his guy was bang in trouble when Tyson punched holes in the wall!

    Lewis knew it was bang on his guy from that point on!
     
  14. boricua100%

    boricua100% Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    Of course he was, and more exciting fighter
     
  15. JoeyP

    JoeyP Member Full Member

    378
    1
    Aug 12, 2004
    As far as who was "better", I'd say Big George had an overall better career. I think it would be a helluva fight H2H with both in their primes. This one's not going the distance no matter who wins.