Do you view a Lewis vs. Rahman rematch was necessary

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The Mongoose, Feb 4, 2011.


  1. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I fail to see how it would have been any different. Rahman KO 5. Same old ****.

    :think
     
  2. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    Rematch to what? If you mean the first fight then yes, because there was a rematch clause. If you mean to the second fight then no. Because Rahaman had his fifteen minutes, and the rematch made it clear that he was a few levels below Lewis.
    Strange thread son.
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Rahman KO 5, nuthugger. Levels below? Laying on the canvas Lewis looked like had been raped, very decisive win. Rahman/Tyson get it on!!!!
     
  4. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    I think the ts is being ironic :think
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Was it irony when Rahman knocked that grin off Lewis' gay face? He emasulcated him!! Rahman KO 5, nuthuggers. Rahman has the right to fight Tyson and call it a career, decisive win.
     
  6. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    Wasn't it a voluntary defense with a rematch clause and rahman got spannered to show lightening dosen't strike twice :good
     
  7. the_baller

    the_baller Guest


    I think you meant moronic.:-(


    Look dude, there was a rematch clause in the contract, so yes, a rematch was legally necessary.
     
  8. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    This is my type of humour , very good!!!
     
  9. freelaw

    freelaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,143
    916
    Nov 17, 2007
  10. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Tyson says otherwise...must he wait forever for his title shot? Rahman knocked Lewis out..he should step aside. What good is a rematch going to do? Same old, same old. Lewis laying on his back, ready to submit to Muslim love.
     
  11. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    :good

    I mean really, do we really need to see Lewis risk his health by getting hammered again? I keep hearing people talk about lucky punch, there is no lucky punch in boxing...and how do they explain all the other times Lewis got stunned in the fight? I think Lewis is clearly inferior.

    Yeah, if Rahman didn't throw the punch. Lewis might have won. If Rahman didn't show up...Lewis might have won.
     
  12. Bajingo

    Bajingo Boxing Junkie banned

    14,050
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjxJ2LH1M-4[/ame]
     
  13. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Rahman KO5 nuthugger! Rahman has the right to walk away with a win, his legacy secure, and maybe fight Tyson if the money is good.
     
  14. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    A little thing called circumstances, my friend. It's not as black and white as you think.
     
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    If you want black and white go to the Klistchko thread, nuthugger.

    This is about Nasty Black vs. Muslim Black. And Muslim Black put your hero Nasty Black on his back like a bride on her honeymoon. :deal