Do you want FMJ to break Rocky Marciano's record 49-0?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by brando, Nov 24, 2014.


  1. brando

    brando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,862
    0
    Oct 10, 2010
    If you agree just say YES or NO if you disagree
    and tell us the reason why.
     
  2. Gerushio

    Gerushio Active Member Full Member

    576
    26
    Sep 4, 2008
    record for heavyweight. Every few months I see this kind of thread.
     
  3. Richel Hersisia

    Richel Hersisia Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,544
    2
    Jan 31, 2005
    other fighters went way beyond 49-0
     
  4. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,545
    2,366
    Apr 22, 2012
    Means absolutely **** all.

    Especially since that's the heavyweight record.
     
  5. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Yes, but it depends on who he fights.
     
  6. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    Against cherry picks/bums ? No.
     
  7. Constable

    Constable Boxing Junkie banned

    7,911
    2
    Oct 7, 2014
    he will cherry pick his way
     
  8. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Too late He's already lost twice Castillo 1 & Maidana 1 i9f the fight had been held ANYWHERE but Vegas. Rocky Marciano earned his 0 Mayweathers is bogus
     
  9. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Its already too late Mayweather should have 2 losses already Castillo 1 & Maidana 1 if the fight had been held ANYWHERE but Vegas. Rocky Marciano's 0 was earned Mayweather's is BOGUS!!!!
     
  10. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    If it happens it happens. I see him going 50-0 and hes out. hard to argue for him being in the top 20 top 15. I mean once he fights and beats Pac he would've fought everyone in his era, still holding lineal titles in mutiple weight classes, over 10 titles, unfied champ and beating Pac can pretty much say Undisputed, over 25 champions fought, 5 weight classes, only like 2 close fights his whole career, has compubox record of +-...man its nuts
     
  11. Constable

    Constable Boxing Junkie banned

    7,911
    2
    Oct 7, 2014
    pac resume is miles ahead of the coward
     
  12. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    :patsch

    its not a record

    if he wants to break the record, chavez senior was 87-0
    chew on that :rofl
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    more weight classes than any era
    10 times as many belts in any era
    10 times more champions and ex champions than any era

    keep inflating his stats :patsch
     
  14. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,252
    38,024
    Aug 28, 2012
    Marciano has the heavyweight record at 49. Willie Pep was 62-0. Benvenuiti had 65. Julio Cesar Chavez had 89. Jimmy Wilde went 103-0. If the undefeated streak is all that matters he is welcome to it. But he should have lost at least once to Castillo, and I'm of the opinion that a record is more about what you did than didn't do. He had a good early career and then cherry picked some light competition in the last half, avoiding the most dangerous fighters at his weight.
     
  15. jonze86

    jonze86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,553
    139
    Sep 14, 2013
    Voted no,because i don't honestly care.

    I'm a boxing fan first,i only want to see the best fights.obviosly then it's harder to go undefeated.but it won't make you a lesser fighter if you happen to lose.

    The level of opponents are more important than 0 on your record