Well RJJ got another chance to prove he's better than Tarver, why shouldn't Pac? The public demand is much much bigger. But yeah, go ahead, you and your pal "close the book on it".
and 3 of the 4 foty caliber, last one being the best. i've never seen so much whining over a fight guaranteed to be huge and top notch action. that's good for boxing, why so much resistance?
JMM holds the only dominant victory of the series. Could be argued Pacquiao didn't win any of those fights. It's clear who the better fighter is, head to head. I don't think another fight is needed personally. We've had 4 great fights, and any more at this stage is tempting fate for a stinker, or someone getting badly hurt etc.
kinda have mixed feelings. I want it to give Pac a chance for redemption and it would probably be an awesome fight again and don't want it cause JMM might KO Pac again.
When you have 3 razor tight fights, and one with a 1 punch ko while getting beat worse than in the previous 35 rounds, it's not quite in the Barrera Jones and Tarver RJJ territory yet. But you may well be right and it'll be an easy one for JMM next time. Great then, he'll get his biggest showcase and payday by far against a guy he should have no issues with. This is easy money for you too, you know the odds won't reflect this.
Yeah, I do. I actually think as boxing fans we have been very lucky to see two of the greatest fighters of the era, in or close to their primes, developing an epic rivalry that has manifested itself in four fights of high quality, drama, controversy and skill. Very lucky indeed.
If the fight were to be made just one year from the Marquez KO and Pac were to win, it would be no less legitimate. Marquez' KO last year means he's the 'better man', but a potential Pac win months later isn't? Wtf?
Why would you expect that? This a ESB, almost everyone is posting with an agenda. Plus hardly anyone here pays for their ppvs, so it's a fart in the wind