It's not about whether you think it's ugly or not. You were looking for the word fluidity instead of ugly style. That makes no sense. Fluidity is what you see IN someone's style. Ugly style as a whole and fluidity IN a style is two different things. I've not argued that his style is good. It's certainly flawed. Do I agree it's ugly? No. Have you provided a good argument as to why it's ugly? No. Your argument FOR it was ****. Again, I don't have anything against whether you do think it was, but with you, It's more a matter of trolling than being honest in a thread. Your posts/threads are pretty **** in my opinion , so maybe that's just a contributing factor.
When it's working it looks great. First 2 rounds against Peterson were pretty exciting. His handspeed was unreal. Even though he was quite inaccurate there were enough punches getting through for it to be effective. People complained about his accuracy against Judah but it didn't matter, it was effective, that's what matters. Though past the 2nd round against Peterson that all went out the record, his handspeed seemed to disappear. I suppose it's not so easy to rush someone like that when they're outboxing you and throwing you off your offense. He needs to bring back that jab he used against Malignaggi.
yeah i was looking for the word fluidity WHEN IT CAME TO HIS PUNCHES. as whole his style IS UGLY in my opinion. ur ****** ass is puttin way to much energy into this fluidity ****. i dont like his style thats it i dont give a **** about the words to describe it u khan nutthugger. and say what u want about my threads ****** but bitches like u keep them ALIVE. good or bad this **** gonna be over 10 pages long. :yep as u can see from the poll its about 50/50 so i doubt im the only one who thinks Khans style is UGLY. please get off khans dick. i dont see how another man can get so offended when it comes to a guy u dont know.