Does any former Light Heavy Champion weight beat a Prime Mike Tyson.

its imbecile with an E not I .TBimbecile

 

You're the biggest loser in the room. Consistently. Glad to be blocked by you. Good riddance.

 

Is that Sam to the G another one of these @The Morlocks tricks ??

 

Not this one mate.

 

This is the most interesting light heavy to throw into the mix. Archie was not just an amazing fighter, but ridiculously tricky and had a beyond-genius level ring I.Q.

 

If holy could I’m sure someone else along the lines could have. Who knows who would have had the skill and chin to make mike fight their fight. Tall order for any man

 

But that is not the question.
WHat the thread title says & most everyone discusses is do any *former* LHW champs beat Tyson.

So they could come in at any weight against him.

 

boxing junky you need to turn into a film junky! How well does Tyson do when an opponent jabs and grabs ?Tony tucker was a guy who did that ! Tony Tucker did not Jab and grab like Tunney did ! Those slip down to the floor and fire lead hook counters are not happening on Tunney, He would have to slip and throw AT THE SAME TIME, not slip then throw ! to catch Tunney jabbing his way into a tie up. Tyson offers nothing to Tunney in the clinch either! I am telling you hes getting stopped or losing every round like Dempsey did!

 

More like different ways of doing the same things . Tuckers height is not why Tyson couldnt knock him out and or why Tucker had some mild success against Tyson it was his technique and tactics . If you did a side by side film comparision (a real one anyhow) you would see Tunney did the jab and clutch style better than Tyson and that opportunity for the Tyson punch would not be there, Tucker gave Tyson options Tunney would not (or the other guys for that matter) Lets look at what appears to be the same thing but watch how Tunney does things (more optimal) than Tucker! height be damned. Tunney would be a nightmare for Tyson.


look at Tucker here ,he jabs and Tyson slips and throws closely the same time he slips(usually he bends really low then throw losing valuable counter time) but Tucker jabs ,his jab is slipped and he is countered. Tucker jabbed and is IN THE SAME SPOT after his punch is missed.He didnt always step in and tie up like he should.

https://makeagif.com/gif/mike-tyson-vs-tony-tucker-prDSOH

Here tunney throws a 1 2 and jack slips it ,but pay attention to what Tunney does after the punch he steps and turns while throwing a lead hook. Look at where Tunney ended up after the miss. What if jack when he slipped did what tyson did and throw, he wouldnt hit tunney because Gene ended up at a new angle.

https://makeagif.com/i/M9VaMb




Most of Tuckers punch and clutch looked like this

https://makeagif.com/i/RxaYij

throwing tying up and holding

Tunney had some exchanges like Tucker where he threw shots and tied up but he also had these kind of exchanges

https://makeagif.com/i/kesMdZ

I do not see tyson dealing with that since no one Tyson is fighting on film did that in the clinch with him.


and while tyson did land when you would throw and try to back


One more time, 2 boxers throwing the same combos does not necessarily mean the same things happened(look at tunneys distance and where he ends up after he throws his combination (angles)

https://makeagif.com/i/aZxlzb

https://makeagif.com/i/MSvM5D

The irony of you saying analyze more when I do stupid tale of the tape stats and really only pay attention to technique on film is hilarious!