Does any middleweight in history KO Marvin Hagler??

A fine bunch of fancy words that, I am sure, are backed by real sentiment.

However, there were no slick fighters back in these guys' day so the crux of your argument is immediately discounted.

 

S,the thread is about any middleweight that MIGHT KO Hagler ! This question implies a banger,and powerful puncher. So what in tarnation has a "slick"
[your word] fighter have to do with this thread ? NADA !
And I am sorry that "in my day", of the 1940s and 1950s, by your standards,
my fighters should be immediately "discounted". Wow...Cheers.

 

Tommy ryan !!!!

 

Bob Fitzsimmons has a good chance.

 

Well he's not old enough to know better ,that's for sure.atsch
He probably wont be spouting anymore stuff, as he has both his feet in his mouth.

 

Fitz
Langford
Ketchel
Steele
Lausse
Robinson
Hostak
Fernandez
Valdez
Marshall
Burley
Delaney
Lomski
Charles
Papp
Moore
Nesmith
Hart
McAvoy
Sands

 

lamotta would absolutely destroy the skinny hearns late

 

I for one am so thankful to have you here in this forum..what, with your wise, sage and racist wisdom. Your user name shows what a buffoon you are.:hi:

 

Robinson COULD but the odds would favour a 15 round decision win for Sugar Ray IMO, both in their best MW form.

Ps. if Ray hits Hagler with the exact left hook he hit Fullmer with tho, Hagler`s taking a 10 count

 

I thought the sarcasm was appropriately dripping...but maybe not.

 

what are the chances of THAT?? this is seriously being way too unfair to hagler

 

Seamus,my answer to you as above was not meant to be sarcastic, but I
cannot believe that the fighters of the 1940s and 1950s,as Ray Robinson, Marcel Cerdan, Bob Satterfield,Freddie Steele, Tony Zale, Charley Burley,
Eddie Booker, Lloyd Marshall, Al Hostak, Jake LaMotta, Joey Giardello, Dick Tiger, Dave Sands, etc, middleweights all,should be "discounted",as not worthy fighters,as you posted...I respect every poster,for their opinions, but
I,one of a few still kicking who saw many of the above , owe it to posterity,
to defend these great fighters of the past..Their memories deserve at least
my speaking up...:good

 

:deal

 

Burt-My post was SARCASM.

I'm tired of people complaining about the bulk of the fighters of the past not being legit because they weren't "slick", a term which I think is euphemistic for various unsavory insinuations. Future sarcasm, however ham-fisted, will be avoided in regards to your posts.

 

S,I accept your answer. I'm usually aware of subtle humor, and respect
your adroitness. Good show S....