Does any version of Chavez beat Whitaker?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Jul 12, 2016.


  1. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    no. He does not have the right stuff to compete with a southpaw of this caliber
     
  2. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,130
    1,428
    Jan 1, 2011
    About one percent of the population thinks that fight was a draw. It was a tour de force by Whitaker, not even close.
     
  3. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,611
    9,202
    Oct 8, 2013
    I believe Chavez could win but it don't feel strong enough to pick him. I do believe his fight was closer than originally believed and I do believe he was past prime while Whitaker was peak prime.
     
  4. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Yeah but the vast majority aren't political appointees of the Mexican based WBC.

    One judge had JC winning the first Randall fight.

    Anyone who thinks judges can't be biased is living in a fantasy world.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,289
    49,715
    Apr 27, 2005
    Or incompetent.
     
  6. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,823
    Aug 26, 2011
    What was your score for the bout? Did you have it a draw yourself?
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,238
    53,717
    Feb 11, 2005
    I have done some research.

    According to a website "boxrec.com", it was ruled a majority draw.
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,823
    Aug 26, 2011
    Not the question I asked, don't be obtuse for the sake of being obtuse. The question was:

    1. How did YOU i.e. Seamus score the Chavez vs. Whitaker fight?
     
  9. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Very true
     
  10. bcr

    bcr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    1,440
    Dec 21, 2013
    No, Whitaker was all wrong for Chavez, and i don't believe the fight was in either best weight.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,238
    53,717
    Feb 11, 2005
    I saw it from about the 20th row in San Antonio (a horrible venue for fights). At the time, I thought it to be pretty boring with Whitaker doing more in the rounds he won but not doing 10-8, and Chavez nipping his rounds. Having later watched in on tape, I have genereally scored it for Pete by 1 and 2 rounds.
     
  12. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,024
    2,265
    Sep 9, 2011
    chavez in place of ramirez 1 would genuinely deserve the decision imo.
     
  13. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,823
    Aug 26, 2011
    Okay, but you keep mention this being a draw, and thus Chavez would do better if younger. In fact though, you don't view the fight as a draw. So I'm just trying to nail down your view, are you saying:

    1. If 3 judges could wrongly score that fight a draw, than surely Chavez doing a little better would get him the win

    or

    2. Chavez would simply beat Whitaker, and bad judging would have nothing to do with it.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,238
    53,717
    Feb 11, 2005

    I could have been wrong. I had it close to being a draw. Perhaps the esteemed Micky Vann is a better judge than I.
     
  15. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    No, he was a hack.