Does anyone believe Carlos Ortiz was the best lightweight - ever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Manassa, Nov 17, 2009.


  1. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    Does anyone else wonder this? When, in 1959, it was announced that Emile Griffith's next opponent was going to be 'Gaylord' Barnes, did Griffith get all shifty and uncomfortable?
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    I dont think he was the best lightweight in the 60s personally
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    Who's your pick?
     
  4. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    84
    Aug 26, 2004
    Napoles no doubt despite it being totally unjustified, though the true contrarian's pick is Rodolfo El Gato Gonzalez.
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    Something I never quite understood.
     
  6. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    84
    Aug 26, 2004
    Well deliberate contrarians are usually just ****s anway.
     
  7. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    That's just it, Duran was more dominant but Ortiz faced and beat the better opposition consistently, at both 135 and 140. He had few lapses even against such high level comp. Don't get me wrong, Duran actual dominated a pretty damn good Lightweight class, just not quite what Ortiz did.

    Williams on the other hand did face even better opposition, but he was also far less consistent against it. Ortiz proved himself the top dog against an excellent crop, whereas Williams had a few too many losses scattered around in there. He also never avenged his knockout loss to Jimmy Carter, and only beat Montgomery when he was a shadow of his former self.

    I rate Ortiz just above Williams based on this, and just below Duran based on Duran's higher weight conquests and sheer ability, though he was indeed the more proven Lightweight.
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    He certainly had the skills. A matchup between he and Ortiz would've been a dream, though their primes missed out on each other by a few years.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    I'm sure me and you both have Ortiz at 5 and Williams at 6? No?
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Live Ortizs shifts in pace, ability to box or fight, and he could punch a bit. As others have previously said he's fairly unflashy but adapts to the job at hand as the rounds pass by, workmanlike attitude and tough too. I personally agree with what was said about him winning at least one in a series of 3 against the greats mentioned. Am I the only person completely uninspired by the footage of Benny Leonard? Man what a career but I can't see how he won so many. Undeniably tough but....maybe the stuff on YouTube ain't up
    to much, can someone educate me as to why he's rankedso highly HEAD TO HEAD, I know how good he was, just can't see it. Maybe the only footage of him available is horribly past prime? Any response will be welcomed :good
     
  11. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    94
    Apr 6, 2007
    I rate Williams one place above Ortiz because Williams beat a significantly higher number of contenders, even if he was less consistent against them.

    Although in saying that, Williams went through a five year period where he wasn't beaten by a single lightweight - 1946 to 1951 (record: 57-7-2). Sandwiching this period were losses to Hall of Famers Sammy Angott and Jimmy Carter. Granted, he never defeated the latter, arguably because Williams was past it by that point, but he had infact showed his superiority over Angott beforehand, despite only being able to squeeze victory every time. Angott was awkward, and the loss was probably a one-off.

    So as said, no lightweight beat Williams from '46 to '51 which is pretty good going, I think. Williams did suffer seven losses during this time, although every one of them was to a rated welterweight. Of course, he was also beating myriad welterweight contenders in between.

    There were also two draws - again, rated contenders. Williams, in his prime, never really lost to anyone less than world class, and at his best, there was no lightweight who could touch him.

    Williams, in 1948, actually recorded the most successful year in lightweight history that I know of. He went 10-0, knocking out contender Buddy Garcia in one round and winning on points against Kid Gavilan. He also defended his lightweight title three times against Beau Jack, Enrique Bolanos* and Jesse Flores, all rated, and beat old foe (and criminally underrated) Freddie Dawson. To pad it out was another rated victory over Rudy Cruz and three general wins over other various capable opponents.

    *Williams won comfortably.
     
  12. nastynas

    nastynas Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,935
    10
    Oct 27, 2009
    I salivate at the thought of Ortiz fighting Williams. I love both fighters.
     
  13. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    36,548
    21,220
    Jul 29, 2004
    One of the ultimate matchups at the weight for me...and thats saying something because that division is jammed pack with great matchups.

    Could you imagine those guys trading hooks with each other?...would be magical. Those two had some of the best punching form Ive seen from fighters hooking.
     
  14. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,259
    Feb 6, 2009
    i have williams in my top 4 but i think he's No.1 to watch.his hooks were so fluid
     
  15. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,276
    20,747
    Jul 2, 2006
    I really havent done any list in a long long time but Ortiz is always underated when it comes to such lists. I mean, i have seen many "experts" place him outside the top 10 which is competely ridiculous. I think Duran is the best ive ever seen but Ortiz should cofortable rank among the top 6 or 7.