Does anyone here believe PACQUIAO vs CLOTTEY was a fixed fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by floyd_g.o.a.t, Aug 7, 2011.


  1. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    That's some sick body punching. No wonder Floyd is running scared. :yep He wants none of that, he will forever duck Pac and that's the sad part.
     
  2. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    the *****s, they don't even realise the beating Pac put on Clottey's body. They watch the fight, but they don't know enough about the sport to see it.

    I remember one floyd fan was like "Pac barely landed anything on CLottey" and I answered "what about all those body shots" and he's like "well yea but I meant the head shots".

    well dumbass, body shots do damage. Body shots ****ing hurt and are effective as hell.





    no no, it was a fixed fight!!!

    idiots
     
  4. NorthernCross

    NorthernCross Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    1
    May 12, 2011
    Context clears things up bigtime. Right before he says that, he talks about how Pac is a "special fighter" and that he is the "fighter of the decade." He was was saying that a loss was the only possible outcome in light of that.

    In real life, I deal with people from many foreign countries, especially those from West Africa. Keep in mind that even if someone is speaking English, there are subtle differences in the meaning of words that people use. For example, when people from West African countries tell me that their families refuse to eat with them, it often means that they've been disowned. But you'd probably never get that as an American unless you hear them talk that way on a regular basis.

    It would be different if Clottey had been saying before that quote that Pac is overrated or that Bob was paying him a lot of money to play a role, but that's not what he said. In this case, he was talking about how good Pac is.

    EDIT: Think of it this way. Either Clottey was saying, "Pac is a great fighter and therefore the fight was fixed" or he was saying, "Pac is a great fighter and therefore I had no chance to win." Which makes more sense to you?
     
  5. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    When Mayweather's opponent stopped punching and becomes hesitant to fight back, that's because Mayweather's style made them think and hold back.

    But when Pacquiao's opponents stopped punching and becomes hesitant to fight back, it's NOT about Pacquiao's skills and offensive arsenals, it's a FIXED fight. LOL
     
  6. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    don't try logic with these people :) they are fanatics
     
  7. Fan88

    Fan88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,823
    1
    May 3, 2009
    Of all Pacquiaos recent opponents only Clottey was neither hurt nor fazed. With extremely little effort he busted up Pacquiaos face. Either the fight was fixed or Josh simply didn't want it enough cuz it was there for the taking.
     
  8. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    What the hell...

    I thought Pacman needs PED to win a fight from shot, over the hill, left over fighters?
     
  9. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    NO.

    Pacman needs PED to win a FIXED fight from shot, over the hill, left over fighters. :lol:
     
  10. MAIN

    MAIN Boxing Junkie banned

    8,280
    0
    Oct 3, 2010

    its ORGANIZED

    "Y'ALL OPINIONS" IS.....U STFU U FILIPINO TROLL
     
  11. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    Dont have to be a ***** to question that fight...
     
  12. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    Go back and watch the fight. Clottey was clearly there for the payday. He never threw anything back at pac and when he did, he busted him up. That fight was a joke and only the *******s can't seem to admit it. Pacman is a good fighter but Larry Merchant and everyone else is hyping him up to be the next big thing, again look at and study the sport of boxing. Who has Pacman fought that makes him so great? I was watching some boxing interviews today on youtube and the interviewee asked the interviewer who has manny fought that made him so great? The interviewer responded by saying Diaz, i believe he was the champ at 135, when pacman moved up. Diaz was slow, and pac's handler's knew that. So let's be real for once, Pac beats up leftovers, has not beat 1 fighter in their prime, and is the king of fighting at catchweights.

    I know some of you musr be saying I am another hater. I don't hate pac, and I do think he's exciting and he's making these boxers that are put in front of him look silly but man come on, why the fuss about getting tested? We all get tested, it's part of life. I just don't understand what's the big deal if you are clean. I would agree to the tests and tell floyd, If i am clean then either you pay x amount dollars, or I get everything I want in regards to the fight. I don't know, I never thought much about until Mayweather brought it up. Manny looks suspicious, and continues to do so. Look, Mayweather makes statements about Manny's finances and deals, etc.. and then what do you know, information about manny's finances and deals come to the forefront, and what do you know, Mayweather seems to be right in that Manny's team looked as if they were ripping him off. I would love to see them fight, but I don't think it will happen.
     
  13. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
  14. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Of course.

    You just need to be an idiot to question that fight.