does anyone still think kessler could have beaten dawson at a 170 cw ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Dec 7, 2009.


  1. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    :lol:

    #1 - Are you ******ed? No way Adamek could make 180-182.
    #2 - Where's your proof Adamek is roiding? What a stupid suggestion.
    #3 - Eric who? Oh that's right, the previous retired 34-year old who got his arse handed to him years earlier by Roy & Tarver.
    #4 - Dawson struggled badly with Johnson first time around, and 2 wins a piece over 40 year old past prime versions doesn't convince me this guy is P4P.
    #5 - How did Cloud get exposed? He clearly beat Woods, who performed far better in that fight than he did against Tarver where he was absolutely woeful.
    #6 - Some reasoning I have? You are the one trying to apply the A, B, C logic by suggesting that Dawson beats Cloud because he was 'exposed' by Woods, who was beaten on wider scorecards by Tarver who was beaten by Dawson. That is atrocious reasoning.
    #7 - Dawson didn't want anything of Cloud just like he didn't want anything of Diaconu before. That fight would of done reasonably well in terms of figures, yet Dawson begged the WBC not to enforce Diaconu as the mandatory. They listened the first time, but not the 2nd, and Dawson prompty binned the most prestigous belt around and went on the OAP tour.
    #8 - I never said Kessler was the favourite to win the Super Six. Regardless, we don't yet know how good Ward might be. For all you know, Kessler could go and beat any of the other 5 but always lose to Ward due to styles.
     
  2. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Ward Punished kessler every round,Dawson will do even worse...Lights out for Kessler
     
  3. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    I think Dawson would stop Kessler.
     
  4. Untouchable Man

    Untouchable Man Active Member Full Member

    550
    0
    Aug 10, 2005
    Kessler just lost to the most inexperianced guy in the tourney, I would even pick Jermaine Taylor to beat him.
     
  5. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    If you think Kessler's loss to Ward says a damn thing about his chances at beating anyone else in the super 6, you're ****ing ******ed.

    As for Dawson, there's the fact that nobody would watch the fight. Then factor in the facts that Kessler dominates when he's allowed to press forward and be the aggressor, whereas Dawson cannot fight moving forward. I can see Kessler stopping Dawson or building up an early points lead based simply on aggression. There is absolutely no way Dawson would stop Kessler.

    The fact that a guy get's beat by being headbutted and held repeatedly, then blinded as a result of headbutts, doesn't say very much about him other than he has an extremely hard time making adjustments in the ring. Ward hardly hit him with any clean, hard punches. Looked like a windmill flying at him, then latching onto him and slapping away.
     
  6. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    i consider kessler at this point of time a medicore favorite to beat taylor.
    taylor is quite done.
     
  7. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    13
    Mar 7, 2006
    Dawson is and always has been light years ahead of Kessler in terms of ability any form of Kessler gets battered by Dawson.
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I never thought Kessler could beat Dawson. Neither did Palle. Palle and Warren are looking smarter and smarter as time goes on. :D
     
  9. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    voted kessler anyway
     
  10. Damo1712

    Damo1712 Boss Full Member

    1,280
    0
    Jan 6, 2009
    re the question, really not sure cos chad aint all that either