Does boxing need better analysts?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by achillesthegreat, Oct 25, 2010.


  1. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    ritchie woodhall is the 1
     
  2. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Sky's team are not so good. McRory, Piper and Nelson and Watt could easily be relaced by much better equipped men for the job. I used to like Setanta's set up much more, with Bunce, Kerr, Woodhall etc. I used to be a critic of Adam Smith but ive grown to like him and his passion lately.

    They have started to bring in Moore and Spencer but I don't personally think they should are the best candidates. Moore seems awkward.
     
  3. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    spencer is top draw
     
  4. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    If you are a non fighter or journo I feel that McGuigan will accept not accept some of the points and views made...:yep

    He was my school days boxing idol, but sometimes his commentary is ace but then sometimes it drives me up the wall... That been said, he is we regarded and is an asset for any boxing show on TV...

    Very Marmite...What do you think...:think Love him or hate him...:think
     
  5. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009

    How could I forget Ritchie Woodhall, he is awesome, he would embarress most of the Sky team as a pundit and commentator...:good
     
  6. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    By the way, I said better but I mean more popular.

    I think McGuigan should do more. He is much more mainstream.