Does Calzaghe Pass the Eye Test?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Jun 14, 2016.


  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,177
    Jun 23, 2005
    Calzaghe was underrated if anything he;'s the GOAT at 168 very skilled with a great ring IQ.
     
  2. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    Prove it.
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    naa mate a guy who struggled to make just 1 defence of one the big three titles isn't a great. Hes way down the order.

    dozens made more than one defence. what migitates for joe is that he at least nocked up a lot of minor title defences.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,177
    Jun 23, 2005
    Dominated the division and beat a prime Kessler and beat a still very good Hopkins at a higher weight. He also impressed me by making better adjustments in the second half of their fight against a Ring master in Hopkins. 46-0 there's no blueprint.:deal
     
  5. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,233
    240,734
    Nov 23, 2013
    :deal
     
  6. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,336
    7,907
    Sep 2, 2011
    Yes, young Calzaghe especially. He's got the kind of natural awkwardness and ability you can't teach.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    He looked great in some fights and scr*ppy in others.

    His unique style caused problems to everyone he faced.

    I used to look forward to his fights when I was younger, as you never knew what type of fight you were going to get.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    :lol:
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    You've made some great points here.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    Okay.

    :nut
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    I think he meant that he was defensively sound, as in his unique offense overwhelmed most of his opponents which meant that he never found himself in too much trouble.

    That's how I interpreted it, but you're right, he never had what you'd call a great defence.
     
  13. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    As far as I'm aware, his notable wins at 168 are Kessler (a good fighter but that's all), and I guess Jeff lacy. He did this while only having the WBO which was not highly reputed at the time (nor still).

    How is this dominating a division? Where is the greatness?

    Is it actually just people repeating the 46-0, destroyed American legends, mantra over and over?
     
  14. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    By the way I'd like to congratulate everyone in this thread in participating in The Most Objective Calzaghe Debate Thread of All Time.

    Well done.
     
  15. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    calzaghe could be an ugly fighter to watch but his biggest attributes were his intagibles.

    he liked to fight
    liked a tear up
    his will to win was always 100%

    he had the most stamina of any 168 in history/ he had fast hands/he had quick feet when he needed them / he could fight in the pocket and at range / he was very adaptable v every single style.

    he could brawl with brawlers like bika
    he could box and take away the jab of classical stand up boxers like kessler
    he could outhustle and take away the hopkins experience and know how.
    he could stay right in the pocket v punchers like lacy
    he could fight southpaws
    fight strongmen
    fight awkward who needs them fighters

    his style in many fights was not eye pleasing but it allowed him to always win / he was definatley not a fighter for the purist / but v other boxers in the ring he did and would have posed problems for every single 168 fighter because you could never get sparring for anything like him.