Does DIllian Whyte have what it takes to be world champion?

Takam pressured Parker more physically but threw less punches like whyte would,what im saying is he starts to breath Heavy FAST no matter who he fights . theres no reason to beleive he wont start to reduce punches as the fight goes,theres just nothing to tell me otherwise. Hes not gassing hes slowing down prematurly ...gassing is not being able to throw punches and looking defeatted on your stool.

 

Whyte is Euro level at best

 

Your right his ceiling does look higher than most of the upcoming guys but there are some names that could give him a loss like Ortiz, Haye or Vlad. So I say if he can beat Vlad and then Ortiz he is the man in the division.

 

he's Euro level, not quite good enough, doesn't have as good a chin as some people make out too. He doesn't have the power to KO even a chinny, weak world champ like Wilder so he's got no chance really.

 

might do today, but are you disputing that the wbo one wasnt recognised in the 90s?

 

u've quoted the wrong person. my post is entirely unrelated to yours.

 

No way he lost to chisora

 

He,s a better boxer than Fury was ....with some luck he could be Champion one day

 

Agreed. They can't all be champs, but there's plenty of room in the sport for fighters who give fans their money's worth.

 

this whyte, man, he dont have what it takes to be world champion.

 

Does it state a dispute there in my post?

To me it just states the most prestigious belts but more to the point, it reaffirms that its an 'actual' world title. Look at our traded posts in this thread so you can hopefully understand.

 

Whyte might as well pick a nice cozy spot in the junkyard cause he's gonna get wrecked by Wilder...

 

thats good, my friend, you agree with me that the wbo 90s title was unrecognised.

 

Thats not what Im trying to point out and anyway its 2016. Why does a belt being recognised in 90s so important? Lol thats just??...lol. No Im just reaffirming its an 'actual' title.

 

No. It is that simple.