If Scott lost to kiko then would carl not be kicking himself for turning down 1.5 million for an easy nights work. Lets not forget kiko has been beaten before Carl
Mate, Quigg is a joke. His 'record' is as padded as a Broadmoor cell, and his status as 'champion' is EVERYTHING that is wrong with the sport! How the f*ck do you WIN a belt when you DRAW with the guy you're fighting? It's criminal.
Carl WON that belt by stoppage, though. He won it. And he fights guys at his own weight; not dragged up junkies or guys who are past their prime but have a 32-3 record. Scott's resume is pathetic and his 'title reign' is the most farcical in world boxing. You CANNOT deny that!
He's basically the interim champion and he won the salinas fight on my card. I admit his last few opponents haven't been great but he has had opponents pull out and munyai was credible. You can't really say different about frampton mate he fought a washed up steve Mollitor, some guy from Africa who ran about in Sheffield. His credible opponents were hirales who was tough but limited, kiko and a very disappointing avalos. It's hardly anything to write home about
Quigg annihilated the guy who Kiko- Carls best win. Is Matinez a good win for Frampton , but not for Quigg? Its clear you're just a casual biased fanboi.
An offer for Frampton to make more money then he ever has and ever will wasn't a good offer? No, that the old tradition of pricing yourself out of the fight.
You haven't got a clue what you are talking about. If the fight does 5m , Sky alone would take 3m of that to cover promotion and production as well as their share. That leaves 500,000 for Hearn and Quigg and you haven't even paid rental of venue, security, undercard purses - the list goes on and on. Framptom is being offered far more than he's worth and he still basically said no