Does Freddie Roach know...............................?

You mad bro?

 

So you're pretty much saying that his size plays a role in why he cant cut down the ring?:rofl

 

Not really! Just trying to get an understanding on what you're getting at because it means **** all to me!:good

Proud you're having fun...Are you done yet?:roll:

 

Just saying bro, if youre gonna call someone else biased, you probably wanna avoid saying **** like "I listen to fighters who have the same opinion as me"

 

Cool story!:roll:

 

Depending on his opposition, yes.

But Cotto, Mosley, Marquez, and Bradley all have very good footwork as well, which should be factored into the equation.

And if you consider that Pacquaio didn't take much punishment in his fight against Mosley, and white washed him on the cards, should that fight even be used to judge his ability?

Cotto did have the most success when he was on the backfoot, but Cotto always has the most success when he's on the backfoot. Same with Marquez.

When Marquez had to chase Mayweather, he looked very human.

Bradley, admittedly, has very good footwork on both ends. He is very good at closing distance, and is hard to catch, but his headmovement also plays a signficant role in this.

Rudyard, what you got to understand is boxing is a game of angles.

 

Bull****

 

I understand angles... So with that being said, why isnt so difficult for Manny to use the right angles to trap his opponents that give him movement?? Its quite simple and all you've stated was its was due to his size...Tyson was a little man and knew exactly how to cut down the ring. So you cant kill that smaller size ****.

 

Prove me wrong.:good

 

I understand what you're saying, but it's different when you're going against a southpaw.

It's part of the reason why southpaw's are so hard to fight.

If they got a height and reach advantage over you, it just creates an angle that's difficult to overcome.

I don't know...try it out. Now, if you're just a big strong dude, you might not care if you get hit with that left hand, and you'd be willing to smother your opponent and bang him against the ropes.

But Pacquaio was smaller than Cotto and Mosley.

No, he couldn't cut the ring off effectively against Marquez, but Marquez has excellent footwork himself, and Pacquaio still managed to win the fight.

Whether or not you agree with the decision, is speculative, but the point is...why the **** are you always disagreeing with me?

I know you watched DLH and saw how I was right about Martinez beating him.

So, why you keep disagreeing with me?

It's Pacquaio's ability to cut off the ring as good as his ability to stay on the outside, of course not...

But if you factor in everything, Pacquaio has some of the best footwork in the game.

People complain that Martinez looks human when he cuts off the ring too. And his opponents aren't as mobile as Pacquaio's last opponents.

I mean, I think there is an unfair bias against Pacquaio.

Put Mayweather in with Martinez, and we'll see how good his ability to cut the ring off is.

He may have to in order to win the fight.

It's phenomenal that an undersized southpaw has been able to acheive this much in his career.

 

Khan has no defense what so ever, he just runs.

But all three of them (Pac, Chavez Jr. & Khan) are very offensive fighters.