Does Fury/Rahman, Buckland on the April 16th Card Make it PPV Worthy?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Apr 4, 2011.


  1. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    To be fair, when you consider that Jhonny Gonzalez vs Jackson Asiku was $50 over in the States, £15 for a slightly lower quality fight with an alright undercard isn't too bad.
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    It doesn't take a genius to work out Khan against a European champion that hasn't really fought anybody of any note on the world stage isn't PPV worthy on a boxing/competitive level. Maybe Khan's hardcore and the Irish are going to pay up for this, which at the end of the day is all that counts. I'm just saying its not that much of a great fight, if this is PPV worthy on a boxing level virtually anything is.
     
  3. jonnytightlips

    jonnytightlips Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,384
    1
    Aug 1, 2008
    The Fury fight is an interesting one. Could see Rahman sparking him out.
     
  4. theuppercut

    theuppercut Blackpudding supper Full Member

    6,084
    0
    Apr 21, 2009
    I'd rather pay £15 for this weekend's Vegas card feat. Maidana and the rest.

    The Khan card is at best an old Friday Fight Night. Fury's getting poleaxed.
     
  5. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    I'm not trying to defend the fight. I think it's a relatively easy fight, along with many others, but what I'm saying is, what do you consider a decent PPV?

    No one outside of Warren is going to produce PPV goods. Are you suggesting we just shouldn't pay for any PPV that's not a Warren card?

    As JP just said, 15 quid is small dosh compared to what you'd be paying in the U.S

    Did you say the same for the Haye/Harrison PPV? Because I doubt you or anyone else would be able to convice the 700K that bought the PPV not to buy it.

    I'd pay £15, and that's just because I'd support it and we're not talking about money that's going to set us back for months now, are we? (Maybe in your case? ;) )

    By the way, did you buy the Khan/Maidana PPV?
     
  6. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Different markets and all that.

    Plus Asiku-Gonzalez was a fringe PPV that none of the networks wanted. Not like it was a HBO or Showtime PPV.

    Anyway, the value of a PPV is down to the individual. If you think it's worth it then buy it, if not - don't. Everyone's not going to agree.

    Personally, this card is not worth £15 of my money.
     
  7. boxing4eva

    boxing4eva Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,382
    0
    Dec 3, 2009
    I am probably looking forward to the Fury fight more than I the Khan one
     
  8. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    I'm not trying to defend the fight. Personally, I'm not going to pay for it, I'm going to find a, erm, different way to watch it, just trying to offer up an alternative perspective. The Gonzalez-Asiku was just an example, many PPV's stateside are in excess of $50, which makes this not too bad in comparison. But when you get used to paying a certain amount for a good PPV card, your not going to pay the exact same for an event that doesn't match up at all, which is how I view it.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,376
    Nov 30, 2006
    Your PPV's only cost fifteen pounds?? :shock:

    Even the crappiest, most low-budget American Pay Per View is more than $20-25 (the rough equivalent of £15). The Latin Fury cards headlined by Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., for instance are typically in the $30 range (about £20).

    Of course, I don't even have the option of purchasing a British PPV so with 'available methods' it's all free to me. :D To be fair, though - many of our expensive upscale PPVs (particularly the $50 and $60 HBO ones) have supposedly been aired free on SKY so it isn't as though the scales are out of balance in our favor. :yep
     
  10. JFT96

    JFT96 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    1
    Apr 27, 2010
    Is Maidana-Morales ppv in Ameria this weekend? Sky have that on without being ppv and we have had plenty of marquez, pacquiao, mayweather fights shown on normal sky in the last couple of years so we can't really complain in comparison with America. Still not buying the Khan ppv though :lol:
     
  11. tazz1234321

    tazz1234321 Active Member Full Member

    720
    0
    Apr 11, 2010
    I don't mind paying £15 every so often for some boxing, watch all the Saturday Fight Nights and other American cards they televise so all in all its worth it to me. I also have Premier Sports and think they come out with some good stuff for £6.99 a month and i just think of it as a couple of pints or one less night out to make up for it.
     
  12. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    In the US at least 'fringe' fights are generally made available on PPV for those that really want to watch them. How many big fights have we missed out on? It's only recently Premier have started picking some quality fights up and Setanta before them.
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,376
    Nov 30, 2006
    The Maidana-Morales farce is indeed a PPV - a $50 (or £30-35) one - but I'm not buying it.
     
  14. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    2
    Sep 14, 2008
    im so used to paying for ppv's..
     
  15. jcairns1

    jcairns1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,513
    289
    Feb 3, 2011
    isn't Andre Berto vs Victor Ortiz included in the package? kind of like Khan vs Maidana was included in Frank Warren's "The Brit Pack" package in december?