Are you for real? That's what the whole thread is about atsch:nut. Maybe read it instead of just replying to my posts for no apparent reason.
What a **** question. Yes it seems like there is less boxing because there is less boxing! It's rocket science!
Wouldn't mind less boxing if the cards were good quality. But at the moment they are all ****. Don't see sky putting up with the rubbish matchroom show for much longer.
Eddie Hearns got all their dates and they've only given him 20, so he can't put on more even if he had the cards to televise as things stand right now. Sky boxings definitely got worse since Boxnation started, to me Sky's the one worth having though, I like to watch different sports and they've got almost all of it.
Know what you mean pal, the glory days of seeing a commonwealth title fight as main event followed by a recorded prospect vs latvian battle. Not like now getting just the 2/3 live fights and more of the undercard on the red button.
Will you **** off with that Bull****. Sky boxing was much better 4/5 years ago, almost every week a Friday Fight night followed by a late Saturday international show. They weren't all great quality but the sheer quantity made up for that, it was much much better back then.
More quantity but no one watched. Sky if boxing does not imprive will cut it they nearly did last year.
SKY have more pundits on the broadcast than they do boxers. Don't get me started on the annoying Betfair inserts.