Does Kessler holds the key....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fat Joe, Apr 15, 2008.



  1. Will that be another win by assoication for Joe :lol:
     
  2. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    i guess since b-hop beat KP all the excuses are that b-hop had a bad night im a big b-hop fan but he was just in there with a better fighter in JOE
     
  3. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Kessler is too robotic to be competetive against Dawson, which is why Palle turned that fight down outright.

    And even if by some miracle Kessler were to beat Dawson, it proves zero about a potential Calzaghe-Dawson matchup.

    You should know better than to cite the Fighter A-B-C triangle theory by now. :deal
     
  4. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  5. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  6. Jan(DK)

    Jan(DK) Joined april 2007 Full Member

    3,454
    0
    Jun 29, 2008
    Any thoughts on my thread about Calzaghe should be Kessler's next promoter?
     
  7. gigogreco

    gigogreco Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,711
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    calzaghes win over hopkins, proved his talent, who shortly after molested the hype train pavlik..

    his career is very similar to hopkins actually.

    should kessler improve a do good, it would enhance joes legacy, but to me he has already proved to ba a really good fighter..
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,540
    83,358
    Nov 30, 2006
    Kessler is an established great already, he's not some god damn prospect. :roll:
     
  9. rabid dog

    rabid dog Active Member Full Member

    522
    0
    Jan 21, 2009
    :good:yep
     
  10. Half-Dane

    Half-Dane L.E.S.B.I.A.N Chairman Full Member

    722
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Hrazuz kyrfafpaf.... TOZEZO! Mugtatu Ghraaaaaaaaa......

    Hey guys, help me juice up this voodoo spell I'm casting to off Palle
     
  11. antcull

    antcull Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,911
    1
    Apr 19, 2008
    Calzaghes legacy is already great enough.

    But a Kessler win over Bad Chad wouldn't hurt
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I'm not much of a resume guy, but it's abundantly clear the people who defend Calzaghe's record in the face of criticisms that he "lost to Hopkins" and "beat a shot Jones" fall back heavily on Kessler. That's just the play by play of it. If Kessler turns bust it will reflect negatively on "Calzaghe's best win."

    Again, not my thing - but this is what I would expect.
     
  13. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Yeah, Calzaghe's legacy is very closely tied to what Kessler does from here on.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,540
    83,358
    Nov 30, 2006
    Again I say: Kessler is not some prospect. He is not an unproven quantity. He doesn't need to do anything going forward to be a bright spot on Joe's resume...he already is, and if he retired or had his legs bitten off by a shark tomorrow, he still would be. If he suddenly goes to **** in the ring and loses five in a row to Manfredo, Hanshaw, Zuniga, Ikeke, and Sanavia - he still will be. What the **** is people's malfunction with recognizing that? So he never beat an A-level fighter. So ****ing what? He's obviously elite, based on the way he dominated B-level guys. At the time that he fought Joe he was performing at a top level, and was the second best 168 lber in the world. He has nothing to prove for that to be validated as an excellent win for Joe. Boxing fans are idiots.
     
  15. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007