Does losing to p4p 1 & 2 make you shot?

and Hatton is not shot

he got KO'd by the two best saw his glass ceiling, made his money, was just a cut below the 2 best had nothing else to prove

plus he was in a gatti like position probably didnt wanna or couldnt make 140 again and wasnt fit to be a welter

 

Mosely fought plaster of margo and de la hoya
Looking at those names apart from what ive just mentioned I dont think any of them would be good interesting fights bar one maybe. hatton vs marquez.

 

It all depends how u lost?
If its hatton style blowout.
Or Marqueeeers close loss.

 

Anyone that loses, regardless of age or performance is shot to a lot of ******s.

 

Shane is still game-He is still a top fighter-not top 10...top 20 though..good pick by Alvarez-Kirkland and El Perro woulda been too easy and they aren't ready for em yet.

 

Oscar was finished and i think Hatton was done as well, he was truly awful in that fight , not taking anything away from manny.

 

I still think he could have taken on guys like khan,bradley,alexander,ortiz,maidana,peterson.
He could very well have been the top guy out of that list or atleast top 3, thats top level in the division imo just not h2h vs the sports very best, there is no shame in that of course.

 

Hatton was shot from Mayweather KO-So Hatton doesn't fit that rule where a fighter gets knocked out and it changes them because you "Like" Manny Pacquiao?

Face it bro-Hatton was done by the time he got to Pac-guy was wobbled up against Lazcano and if they didn't stop that fight for Ricky to "tie his shoes" then he woulda been stopped man-:deal

Philla it's becoming very easy to own u in pac-mayweather type debates-very easy-

your argument is extremely weak:deal

 

oscar was shot as much as it can be applied to a guy of his caliber.
when you lose 4 out of your last 7 fights and mayweather being in the middle of handing him the loss and pac being the last guy..its safe to say he was "DONE" already.....shot or whatever you want to call it