Does Marquez rank above Morales and Barrera?

Lots of revisionist history in this thread by fans of all three fighters.

 

em
mab
jmm
stop falling into the trap of the last victory syndrome.

in his prime, jmm had losses to john and pac.
mab had losses to jones and pac.
em had losses to pac and mab but has a victory over both.

 

One day someone will do 4 kings part 2: Morales, Marquez, Barerra and Pacquaio. A shame not everyone fought each other.

 

Not too late. Can still happen.

 

Jmm
Morallah
Mab

 

The only fighter that clearly beat Marquez was Mayweather, And that was at a weight he didnt belong in.:deal

 

Morales will beat him.

 

Pacman lost to wayy lesser fighters than Jr Jones, John or Norwood, so STFU.:deal

 

I'm undecided on how I rank all three, but I think Marquez now clearly has the most impressive single performance of the three. Whether he has the resume depth to overtake Barrera and Morales is of course another question.

 

:huh

Morales

0-3 vs Barrera
1-2 vs Pacquaio
1-5 vs. the two. :!:

Marquez

3-0 vs Pacquaio
1-0 vs Barrera
4-0 vs. the two. :hey

Barrera

3-0 vs Morales
0-2 vs Pacquaio
0-1 vs Marquez
3-3 vs all three.


1. Chavez
2. Olivares
3. Sanchez
4. Marquez
5. Saldivar
Barrera
Morales
Canto
Zarate

:deal

 

Looking at records without conforming to the narratives of boxing hype and media, there's certainly a case for it.

 

Well, one thing's for sure. JMM had to do the dirty work, got dropped 3 times and had to adapt on the spot to set the blueprint for Morales to beat Pac.:deal

 

all three are equal in my book. the only problem for marquez is that he got his big fights way late into his career in comparison to barrera and morales......

 

above Morales but not Barrera

for me Barrera was clearly the best of the three while Morales was the worst. I can accept Marquez being higher than Barrera though

 

Prime maybe, right now no way.