Does Montell Griffin deserve credit for his win over Jones?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EARL, Mar 29, 2008.


  1. EARL

    EARL Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    1
    Mar 8, 2008
    Yes, he won the heavyweight title.. then depleted himself of the muscle he built. It's not really to difficult to see.

    No, his body was beat down because, as I said above, weight-draining.


    Jones was in his prime for the Hopkins fight, then?

    And what's this about Tarver being one of the best? Jones had already beaten fighters clearly better, or just as good as Tarver.

    Eric Harding
    prime Montell Griffin
    Clinton Woods
    Julio Cesar Gonzales

    ****.. I'll even throw Derrick Harmon in there. :lol:
     
  2. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Of course I will see a difference. They are two different opponents, and two different styles. Let alone that Gonzalez was a young up and comer and Hill was fresh off a loss to DM. Those titles that Roy won were basically handed to him after they were wrongfully stripped from DM right after he beat Hill. Hell, right after Roy beat Hill, he was dropped by another southpaw in Lou Del Valle... was Jones washed up for just a second in that fight too? Fighters are not perfect, and they are all able to be beat... even in their prime.

    That was a brutal body shot BTW. I always loved that body shot that Roy ended Hill with.
     
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :deal on point sir...
     
  4. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    No, Del Valle caught him. So what? This has nothing to do with anything and is a singular instance. Jones showed a decline in speed over a period of time from 2001 on.

    And Jones didn't win a single one of DM's titles vacant AND he had his own title prior to DM being stripped. Not relevant anyways.

    Don't try to make this either/or with me. It's a BS propostion. Just because a fighter loses doesn't mean he shot. On the other hand, just because he is still winning doesn't mean he is prime.

    Hill's style has nothing whatsoever to do with Jones speed, reflexes, etc. I think you know that. You can simply watch his fights in succession and see a decline.
     
  5. EARL

    EARL Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    1
    Mar 8, 2008

    Oh yeah.. reaaal easy to judge a fighter by one round. :lol:

    Hell, by watching this round from their third fight you'd think Jones fought the ENTIRE fight like this, right?

    [YT]GPP9ffqGYHk[/YT]


    It might be a hard fact to comprehend but some fighters don't have a 1000 excuses to make after losing.
     
  6. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    I agree completely with what I highlighted. I think the difference is that I don't believe that Roy was showing decline before he fought Tarver, and you do. Not really a big deal, we just disagree.
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Fair enough.
     
  8. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Thanks for proving my point. It just shows that if allowed, Jones COULD fight exactly like he did right there. You can't act like he lost all of his speed, and reflexes... but can get them all back for a round or so every now and then. If he can do it, than he can do it... he shown in both the 2nd and 3rd fights, that if Tarver didn't bring the heat on him, at that he would look as he always did before. He was able to show his blazing speed, and reflexes... so obviously they were there.
     
  9. EARL

    EARL Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    1
    Mar 8, 2008
    I don't recall there even being one round in their first fight where Jones looked like he did in that round. Hell, he didn't even look like that in either of the rounds in their second fight. :lol:

    And by this logic you don't think that fighters can't be there full self for a given fight then, right? The writing is on the wall and if the whole fight was posted on YouTube I'd take you step by step and show you the signs of decline.
     
  10. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    We aren't going to convince eachother of anything different. No problems.:good
     
  11. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    You'll Find The Answer To This Thread In The Rematch ...
     
  12. EARL

    EARL Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    1
    Mar 8, 2008
    No, but as I've said.. thankfully for you the whole fight is not on YouTube. :good
     
  13. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    I have all three on tape. BTW, I love the avatar. One of my favorite characters of all time. If HBO had a face, I would punch it in the mouth for dropping that series before the last season.
     
  14. Shane_Erich

    Shane_Erich Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,165
    2
    May 18, 2007
    Hell No. He could have continued but knew he would have been KO'd. He took the easy way out and got what he deserved in the 2nd fight.
     
  15. EARL

    EARL Active Member Full Member

    1,248
    1
    Mar 8, 2008
    Finally you say something we can agree on. :yep