Does muscles have anything to do with how hard you punch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LT*3, Jan 8, 2012.


  1. Dunk87

    Dunk87 Active Member Full Member

    770
    0
    May 23, 2011
    Think about it like a car... the engine could generate 300bhp but only actually be able to transfer 200bhp to the road. Same with a punch, its the technique that's critical and transfers the power effectively.
     
  2. dru626

    dru626 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    pretty much this ___^ you have to plant your feet and literally push the ground to get power. Muscles brings mass wich brings more impact.
     
  3. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Gerald Mccleland didn't have many muscles but he hit very hard.
     
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    EXACTLY

    no different than HOMERUN power

    ive seen 250 pound guys hit only 15-20 homeruns a year

    and a guy like ken griffey jr who weighed about 210 could hit 40 to 50

    technique is a huge factor
     
  5. PaoloMirani

    PaoloMirani Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    1
    Oct 31, 2010
    Muscle type matters. There's fast and slow twitch. The higher ratio of fast gives you more explosive movements. They're the ones trainers would say have more "snap" in their punches. Classic example of a fast-twitch guy is Roy Jones, and of course, the guy in my avatar.
     
  6. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Tito wrapped his hands illegally to make his punches hit harder.
     
  7. dru626

    dru626 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    your body type has alot to do with the power you will generate. if you are a natural Welterweight and you build up muscle to become a heavyweight most of times the punching power will not travel with you
     
  8. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    Muscles are very important. If your muscles didn't work, you'd be Stephen Hawking.

    Muscle Mass is not much of an important factor but Muscles in general are very important, they enable you to do pratically everything a human can do.

    What is most important is muscle strength, denisty, endurance and fast/slow twitch ratio rather than body building type, purely for aesthetic reasons, big muscles. Body building type muscles are built up with waste muscle material that the body produces to heal the constant damage that body building does to your muscles. This waste means more muscle mass that your heart has to pump blood to which = a decrease in stamina and endurance.
     
  9. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    :good You can have all the muscles you want if your technique is bad you wont punch hard...
     
  10. artdawg

    artdawg Grammar butcher beeaTCH Full Member

    3,971
    0
    Jul 13, 2008
  11. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    When u lift weights u get injured. When u get injured u need xylocaine. When utake xylocaine u want to take peds to build more muscle,when u take peds u get angry, when you get angry u cant properly use ur brain in the relaxed state, when u cant use ur brain in the relaxed state you cant dominate Marcos Maidana.
    When u cant dominate Maidana you look for people in the audience to blame for losing to Lamont Petersen.
     
  12. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest


    :tired
     
  13. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,705
    292
    Jun 15, 2011
    Speed + Mass + Leverage (arm length) + support (using your legs.)

    Heavy arms can help in that (as someone else wrote) they add mass to the equation. However, more often than not, too much arm muscle will slow the punch down, so it's a trade-off.

    Guys with excellent technique (fully using their legs, turning the punch, etc) can get away with less arm mass, since their whole body is behind the punch. Thus, they are especially dangerous because they also have speed.

    Now consider George Foreman, as an example of the other way that can work: He had fairly slow punches, and often did not really have great technique behind them, (didn't always use his legs well) but the sheer mass of his arms & chest made him just as lethal as, say, a Holyfield.

    & finally, consider Margarito: Slow arms, lousy technique, but lots & lots of mass in his gloves. (sorry, couldn't resist.)
     
  14. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Gerald Mclellan 6'0" 160lb, toned but not muscualr as such

    Mike Tyson 5'11" 215lb muscular individual.

    Both around the same height, both considered huge punchers, Mike Tyson UNQUESTIONABLY hit harder and i think size had something to do with that.

    To put it in perspective muscle isnt everything but it certainly makes a difference, a 6 foot 140lb man on the street and a 6 foot 220lb man on the street with muscle, im pickng 220lb'r to hit harder every time
     
  15. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    agree with everything except what you said about Foreman...he just happens to be a very heavy handed guy thats also massive....naturally strong....
    the guy below
    6 foot 4 made pro debut at 234 pounds and fought mostly around that or up to 246 pounds...

    NEVER had 1 knock out in over 43 fights



    This content is protected

    This content is protected