The man criticized Team Mayweather for holding Pac to a rigorous drug testing standard to ensure a level playing field, and yet he single handedly discovered TWO CHEATERS (Tito, and Marg) using illegal hand wraps that the New York and Nevada State athletic commissions, respectively, let slide by. Obviously the commissions are just there to get their share of the $, and really don't give a f--- either way about the safety or health of the fighters. Floyd has a right to protect himself, just like Nazim had a right to protect his fighter and demand fair play. Bitchardson is turning into a big joke.
lol u mad ? lol @ trying to attack richardson. he is a great tribute to the sport. a great trainer and a great strategist.
I dont think he is a ***** (JMO) but for someone who is becoming known for his attention to detail, I wouldnt expect him to criticize floyd for thinking that the NSAC isnt suitable enough, especially since he has experienced their shortcomings.
There is no proof there is little proof Nazim is a great trainer, and positively 0 proof that he is a great strategist. What fight strategies can you point to that support that opinion? Precisely.
richardson as a trainer is getting wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy toooo ****en overated......so he tought a few guys how to ****en clinch WOW !!!!! how about he gives us a guy that he's taught since day one and has turned him into a p4p champ.... ROCK ALLEN is all you got nazim, so stfu with your nonsense fake ass religious bull****
BHOPS famous looping right, headbutt, clinch followed by 3 rabbit punches and a blow to the balls or theigh (depending on what side the ref is on) nazim claims to be MR. CLEAN, yet profits off of two cheaters....
All Nazim said was, Manny's achievements came off the back of hard work and talent, not by cheating. But in your eyes, Nazim's a ***** for holding the same opinion that the rest of the world is holding? Get the **** outta here
I do kinda agree with this because, before bernard hopkins I never heard of NAAZIM. Listen, i can get in the ring and talk to bernard and shane and make sure that when the camera is in my face, say some catchy phrase. In other words, you have two great fighters who hired a new face in the corner. I havent seen nothing different from these guys than when they were without NAZ. On the other hand, If he did something significant like what roach did in teaching manny how to attack with both hands instead of just his left then i would say ok, but those two boxers were pretty much set before NAZ. Can you tell me something significant? I honestly dont know.
When did Nazim start coming into his own though? Bouie Fischer was Bernard's main man and when he took off, Bernard was fully established and wise beyond his age as a fighter that IMO he didn't actually NEED anybody (in this case Nazim) as a trainer. Did it all start with him working with Mosley?
Nazim had the evidence against the two. With Pac, here's what he thinks. "If I dont have any proof on anybody about anything, I wont say anything, he (Nazim Richardson) remarked during a conference call. http://boxing.fighthype.com/2010/04/mosleys-trainer-comes-to-the-defense-of-pacquiao/
:rofl:rofl You're tripping homie, let the man speak his OPINION...He can speak his OPINION without fans like you going over the top! Some of you guys just let fight hype go to far IMO. Its not that ****ing serious!