Does Pacquiao has a rematch clause in the JMM 4th fight?

i don't know.. Millions of dollars maybe? And a welterweight belt?

 

There is nothing more definitive than the KO on Pac. No need for a 5th fight. Pac could just console himself with the fact that he continued to be more popular than JMM and still considered to be a better fighter, at this point of their careers, base on accomplishments.

 

Pacquiao was dominating the fight and Marquez landed one sublime counter. There are certainly more definitive ways to get knock outs.

 

I won't really say it was a domination prior to the KO. Both had their moments. I just felt that JMM always has Pac's numbers as shown in their 3 previous fights, the KO further confirms that. There is really no shame in losing to to a great boxer like JMM. Its time to let it go. Other equally exciting fights can be had by each one of them against other fighters.

 

I think the probablity of JMM being able to outbox Mayweather is higher than him getting a fair decision vs Pacquiao.

 

People massively exaggerate JMM's ownership of Pacquiao. They also exaggerate the judging as if there is some vast conspiracy against JMM. Pacquiao has never gotten a unanimous court against JMM. His wins have been razor tight on points. There's no conspiracy against JMM losing a razor tight fight by one point on one card as he did in fight II.

 

"I thought he won all three of them!"

Since fight 4 ended by Pacquiao being KTFO, is there a known and respected non-hbo boxing columnist or ****yst who has ever said this about Pacquiao???
Numerous have said it about Marquez.

 

Jesus, something is wrong with this forum when you cant even write a-nalyst without it being censored. :-(