Does Riddick Bowe fit in amongst the top 20 ATG'S?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by US_FightFan, Aug 21, 2009.


  1. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I agree with that. Patterson is more like top 25-30, just ahead of Riddick Bowe.
     
  2. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009
    There seems to be 2 schools of thought on Bowe:-

    A) A really talented fighter who only produced his best for a very short period (Holyfield) and who is a H2H problem for anyone in history.

    B) An average fighter who was just a bad match-up for Holyfield and never proved anything beyond that trilogy. In addition to this he ducked Lewis as he knew would lose to him and WASN'T shot when getting outboxed by Golota (it was less than a year after he beat Holyfield).

    Personally I'm in the 1st group, but not to the extent that I'd have him in my top 20.
     
  3. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005

    overlooking your opponent and being out of shape does not equate to being a done fighter.

    he knew what to expect the second time around showed up in shape and the result was the same.
     
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Exactly. Many people forget that Bowe came into the second fight in great shape and he already knew what to expect.
     
  5. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I'm a bit in between those.

    I DO think Holyfield was a good matchup for him, but at the same time, Holyfield beat him fair and square in the rematch. Whether Bowe was in shape or not, that's his own fault and goes AGAINST him. In the third match, Holyfield was having his way until his heart gave in and he could only throw 20 punches a round. Joe Cortez even said that he was an inch away from stopping the fight after the Bowe knockdown, but Holyfield didn't do anything. Rightfully so... look at the tape.. Bowe was out of there.

    He wasn't completely "shot" when Golota destroyed him, but not in peak condition either. Again, it's his own fault he wasn't in shape. And it was only 4 years after his peak fight. Too little longetivity and a thin resume besides one great win. Top25, i'd say, maybe #20 at best.
     
  6. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    That makes Golota top 15 right?
     
  7. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    You contradicted yourself there amigo :lol:
     
  8. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    This is revisionist history, and debatable. As is well known, Dempsey signed and wanted to fight Wills, Rikard and Kearns scuttled the fight. As for Greb, he was a middleweight who would have been destroyed by a prime Dempsey - basically another Johnson-Ketchell situation.

    Dempsey has become sorely underrated by boxing fans in the 30 years I've been following the sport. When people who actually SAW him were still around, he routinely was ranked at the top - some even had him ahead of Joe Louis.
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005

    How so?
     
  10. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009
    Your good post there was negated by the fact you had Bowe 3 places below Lewis as an all time heavy!!!

    Looking at it now, even you can't think that's right can you!?!? Perhaps you think Lewis is so overrated that you underrate him to even the difference.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's revisionist in that it's been decided by a gathering of evidence and that evidence has been applied do draw a conclusion.

    Your dismissal of Greb is reviosionism at it's absolute worst - your opinion. And not one held by Tommy Gibbons who Demspey fought instead of Greb inspite of Greb's utterly dominating Tommy three tiems and who felt Greb would have won, much of the general public who were very keen to see the fight (though not as keen as they were to see Wills) and some of the press at the time.

    Certainly, against shared opponents Greb did better than Dempsey. In arguable fact if those interest you.

    Interestingly, whilst reading up on Greb's challange to Dempsey, I found this remark made by Dempsey to a writer for the Pittsburgh Post: "For the life of me, I can't understand why he gave that negro a chance to take away his title." This was on Greb's loss to the black Flowers (somehow, someway, Greb found it possible to put his title on the line against black fighters who deserved the fight). Dempsey understood how the colour line worked, and he used it to his advantage.

    That is revisionist hisotry based upon study.

    Rather than yours which is based upon rather ill informed opinion.


    Yeah, same as those who saw Fitz, same as those who saw Jeffries, same as those who saw Johnson. It's called generational bias. Another example of revisionism.
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    :goodgreat post
     
  13. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    3,259
    3
    Oct 10, 2007
    I'd put Riddick in the top 25 probably AT number 25.
     
  14. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    Yeesh McGrain take out his big ole boxing brain ... and slaps someone around with it ! :D
     
  15. darthhutchence

    darthhutchence Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,505
    0
    Jun 20, 2009