I'd guess that most automatically answer "no" to this one, but there are reasons to think that the achievements aren't that far apart. * Ruiz were probably more or less as good a HW as Barkley was a MW. * Ruiz weighed almost 60 lbs over Jones's best weight, while Barkley only weighed 25 lbs over Duran's. * Jones was a couple of years younger than Duran was against Barkley, but he was also well into his 30's. * Jones's win was clearer. There are more things to it, but that does give at least a bit perspective.
I always thought RJ was a small lightheavy, and was so impressed how he just blew guys out. Fighting at heavyweight he looked ridiculous with his chicken legs and his huge upper body. To me that was incredible to see a guy that really should have been at 168 tops, fighting a guy over 200 pounds that was a seasoned heavyweight. Its not Ruiz was feather fisted guy either, he could punch a little. I think there is no comparison here. He was just a freak of nature with his speed, and its ashame now to see him look ordinary now that he has lost a step.
Yes, both were much smaller men who were fighting limited titlists who were not nearly the best in their respective divisions.
Absolutely not. Jones-Ruiz is closer to Toney-Jirov than it is to Duran-Barkley. Duran's win over Barkley is on another level. Jones-Ruiz or Toney-Jirov would have been a better thread.
To come close to what Duran did to Barkley. Jones would have to have beaten a fighter on the level of, Rahman, or Bruno. Not Ruiz.
But these guys were 60-70 lbs above Jones's best weight. That's could in a way be compared to pitting Duran against a CW. I know that the comparison isn't quite as straightforward as that, that there are diminishing returns to weight advantage after a certain point, but still...
Here's a list cobbled together from the other Duran-Barkley thread: - Duran was 38 - He was a natural lightweight - The fight was two traditional/classic divisions up - The guy he was fighting was a natural mw & current world champ - The only man to beat Barkley in the previous 5 years was the superb Sumbu Kalambay - Barkley had stopped Hearns in 3 rounds in his previous fight, and so was rightfully a huge favourite - Barkley took the excellent Michael Nunn to an SD in his next fight - Barkley was bigger, stronger, younger, fresher, had better power - Duran won the fight convincingly, even though it was close & competitive. His performance was nothing short of magnificent - Duran KD'd Barkley - Barkley was a better mw than Ruiz was a hw - When was the last time a lw champ moved up and won a mw title? - Duran was in his 22nd year as a pro (started a long way away below mw)
Ruiz beat Rahman. To answer the question above, I think it was a bigger win in my mind. In reality Jones could have competed at heavyweight at 170, the added weight hurt more than helped, so fighting guys 30-40 pounds heavier was something special in my book. The difference just in punching power was huge. It was common to see lightweights sparring with middleweights in the gym, but not middleweights and heavyweights, it was just too much of a power difference. Styles make fights. Who would have thought Manny Pac would completely dominate and stop ODH.
Most of these were adressed in my opening post. And some are questionable: *Were Barkley really a better MW than Ruiz was a HW? Perhaps, but to me there doesn't seem to have been terribly much between them. *Yes, Duran's victory was clear and he scored a KD, but it was still close and Duran was hurt/rocked on several occassions. Jones win was pretty plain sailing, wouldn't you say? But you made one important point that I actually was waiting for: While Jones's feat had been done before, Duran was alone with his. This does tell me something, actually. But I'm not sure that it by itself means that the wins are on different levels.
Is Chagaev-Valuev as good a win as Duran v Barkley as well then? Valuev beat Ruiz, and Chagaev was giving away far more weight v Valuev than Jones was v Ruiz. Weight is not the only factor, nor even the single most important one.
Well, you saw what I wrote about diminishing returns and this is certainly true over 230 lbs. But most would agree that there ARE differences between 167-175 lbs and 220-225 lbs.
Jones didn't weigh 167-175lbs though. He weighed in at 193lbs and was apparently around 200lbs on fight night. Is a brilliant cruiser/borderline heavy beating a mediocre heavy who was around 220lbs as good as Duran-Barkley? I think not.