I personally think he doesn't the deserve the title, I feel his resume is tarnished by the PEDs taken and the fact that he lost major fights against guys like Wright, Forrest. IMO there's only ever been two Sugars, Robinson and Leonard! The 'Sugar' title should be used for fast, slick, powerful boxers who fought everyone and beat them all. What do you guys think?
He was a fabulous amateur, a destroyer at lightweight and jumped two divisions to beat Oscar in his prime. He's fought everyone and stands as a bonafide warrior. He deserves the name but it's time to pack it in.
Well he sure has a "sweet" rear shot... sad he didn't use it much the last fight. :54 and 1:04 [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60GuoYpmbJo[/ame] :17 [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDUGFGfljIM[/ame]
Yes but he's a known drug cheat! I'm not questioning his warrior spirit but if your gonna use the sugar nickname, you have to do it justice. I think he discredited the name.
This. Its a little to late for him having to prove his name to anybody. The man is respected enough in the fight game he earned it a long time ago.