Does size count even just a little bit?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Feb 22, 2016.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,099
    27,453
    Jan 3, 2007
    Sure it does. But that's not the argument. The argument is what if you took a 6'5", 240 lbs man and put him in with a 5'10", 180 lbs man and weather or not it makes any difference. My position is that it does.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Of course it does. That's why it's crazy to match up a man weighing 180 against a man weighing 240.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,099
    27,453
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed. But the premise of some people is that its irrelevant WITHOUT making the sort of changes that you propose.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I disagree with those.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    This content is protected

    Before 1980, pretty much true in terms of skills. Willard, Simon, and B Baer do not compare to Bowe, Lewis and Klitschko.
     
    choklab likes this.
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,641
    Mar 17, 2010
    How do you compare the skills of Willard with Wilder?
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2017
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    If you think someone like Marciano is less skilled than a SHW from today, it's an easy pick.

    If you think he's more skilled it's much harder. I mean Chagaev gave away a **** load of weight to Valuev but still beat him cos he was better. He beat Shkor, he beat Vingo, he beat an old Joe Louis.

    Everything past that point is conjecture.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,937
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is hard to say who was more skilled, because the skillsets are so different.

    Both have thrown the boxing book out of the window, and adopted a style based on their size.

    Both were obviously very good at what they did.
     
  9. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,719
    1,670
    Jul 8, 2010
    The skills of Wilder???
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    The easiest comparison of skillset is the most basic comparison.

    P4P winnability.

    Who does better

    Marciano against a field of men weighing no more than 190 on fight night

    Or

    Klitschko against a field of men weighing no more than 240 on fight night.
     
    choklab likes this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,937
    Feb 15, 2006
    Then Marciano surely?

    Not much to fault about his record!
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Is it coincidental that Bowe, Lewis and both Klits came AFTER steroids were invented?
     
  13. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,788
    18,676
    Jan 6, 2017
    Klitschko was no different than terrel or ruiz in terms of skill honestly, he was just taller and heavier due to modern nutrition and training.
     
  14. Eel87

    Eel87 Active Member Full Member

    966
    450
    Nov 10, 2014
    They need to make a super heavy division above 225 orsomething
     
    choklab likes this.
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,731
    52,807
    Feb 11, 2005
    Size is the primary detriment in martial arts. Weight divisions do not protect the smaller fighter from the larger but do the exact opposite.

    The more you know.