Does the Jermain Taylor apologism ever end?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Sep 23, 2007.


  1. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Brother no matter what the media says . . . if a fighter wanted to make excuses then it won't affect him. That's a fact. Just like JMM not fighting Guzman, like JMM not weanting a rematch with Pacquaio 3 years ago, like DLH not wanting to fight PBF again and so on and so forth.

    The fight is happening because Taylor wanted it . . . is it that hard for you to accept the fact of the case. :yep
     
  2. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    But you see, the difference is that one of Taylor's selling points even with his flaws and boring fights is that 'he fights anybody, anywhere, anytime', for that to be disrupted pretty much brings out a lot of 'Amsterdamic' Taylor logic from a majority and not a minority.

    It's really a different situation than a JMM or a DLH, not even close, because JMM and DLH have shown so much class in ability and therefore the 'excuses' ring louder than one that would come from a guy who was at that point being insanely criticised.

    JMM's not fighting of Pac came after he gave Pac a near loss, Taylor's excuse would come after struggling with feather fisted guys and recieving the necessary criticism, where as JMM made one of the most incredible 'heroic comebacks' after that first round in recent history.

    Plus factor in the people that despise Taylor for the controversial decisions, you just can't compare this stuff at face value.
     
  3. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Yeah right they are biased . . . unlike you? :think

    Nah nah nah I never said Taylor was great and Pavlik is ****. I picked Taylor to win that's all, but I never spend time to degrade or insult any fighter. And I will never give credit to posters like you and Ams_t who spend time degrading fighters because of HATRED. If Pav wins it doesn't necessarily mean what you have said are all correct anyway. :yep

    It's not hard to realize that he has never faced any puncher yet because the fighters on top were not big punchers . . . now Pavlik is the first one . . . isn't that right?
     
  4. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Oh yeah? :D Just like Winky refusing a rematch?

    The fight is happening because it's the right fight and Taylor wanted it. :yep
    That's very short dude . . . he wants to prove naysayers like you are completely wrong. :hey
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Hard to blame Winky really, you can't get anything even resembling a competitive fight's decision vs. Taylor and he cannot KO Taylor.

    Plus, if you will read my recent work on 'circle jerking' within 'names', you will see that Wright, even with his hard work to the top, is still at this point guilty of this.

    Tune up against a shot Quartey this time after immense trouble with an unknown in Soliman and then off to the multi-million dollar worthless Hopkins-Wright bout. So it's all relative.

    Taylor really couldn't have ducked Pavlik and saved his image, that's actually true considering the hints of an uproar that were going about.
     
  6. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    1) I am not crowning myself as an expert - I am just giving my take. I never read "experts" opinons on other sites. I really don't care what they have to say, really. I like better to look for myself, and give my own take on the matter.

    2) Good way to go about it. That is very honorable. However, I don't hate Taylor, I just feel that people are buying too much into his accomplishments. If people say that he is elite, and I know that he isn't then I respond to it. Don't you. Dont confuse hate with enlightenment.

    3) That is right.
     
  7. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Yes, you are right - there is just the evidence of him not facing a ko puncher.

    Despite him being big enough to fight at SMW, he fights at MW, and fights smaller guys - at least more often than not.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    37,125
    12,055
    Jan 6, 2007
    Taylor fought Hopkins twice. Hopkins is a big Middlewt with decent power.

    He's fighting Pavlik, another big guy with KO power.

    What form will your criticisms take if(when) Taylor defeats Pavlik, a good, still developing, B level fighter, by clear UD or very possibly, by stoppage?
     
  9. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    I believe that Taylor is not a P4P level fighter, he just happened on the right bouts at the right time. However I do not agree that he is an "overated scumbag" or with any other preposterous claims I've read in this thread; I simply believe that if he does run into a smooth boxer, or a puncher with at least decent accuracy (is Pavlik one of these? we still don't know tbh, as Miranda himself does not know what defence is..) he would lose.

    His chances of success at higher weights (I define success on a P4P scale, in terms of beating the #1-#3 at the weights) are very marginal.
     
  10. SKULLSPLITTER

    SKULLSPLITTER The CEO Full Member

    978
    0
    Sep 20, 2007
    He does and is and has...

    Some people mainly hate on Taylor because he has two wins over their boy, Hopkins. This type of fan is known as a "mark". These Johnny come lately fans were told Bernard was great...so they watched a few of his fights and latched onto him as one of their faves.

    and their favorite got beat.

    You guys know how it goes. It's the same old ****.

    That's all there is to it. Taylor is a fighting champion who hasn't ducked anyone. Big deal some close decisions went his way. That happens in Boxing you know...

    and for the record....you're not a REAL Hopkins fan unless you watched him come up and liked him before he beat Tito. THAT'S when it was cool to be an X fan.
     
  11. bigeddie27

    bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,179
    1
    Apr 7, 2007
    its gonna be greart amsterdam when pavlik gets knocked out. i will never let you live this one down as long as you are on this board.
     
  12. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    I agree that Taylor has done his job, i think he won both Hops fights, and he is not to be discredited. But as far as the argument on whether he could have avoided Pav, it's the same scenario as Oleg and Peter. People are all over Maskaev because Peter fought TWO eliminators to get his shot. Now Pavlik has fought TWO eliminators to get his and if Taylor would have fought anyone else, he would have been hammered. Pavlik KO 7.
     
  13. ChampionsForever

    ChampionsForever ESB VIP

    4,053
    1
    Dec 3, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  14. bigeddie27

    bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,179
    1
    Apr 7, 2007
    well its hard to unload when you are taylor and....

    a: you are fighting hopkins who nullifies every offense there could possibly be by pushing, headbutting, using pitty arm punches (for points and to look good for the judgeS), etc... i mean he is the very definition of 'cagy vet'

    b: you are fighting winky wright who - see above hopkins and is a southpaw with a high almost unpenetreble gaurd

    c: you are fighting kassim ouma who seems to throw these weak ass arm punches all the time. no power but will defeinetly disrupt your big shots

    d: you are fighting cory spinks whos 'run and hit' style will just never make anyone look good. i respect his skills though.
     
  15. bigeddie27

    bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,179
    1
    Apr 7, 2007
    and after watching the countdown, i honestly have to say, pavlik winning the title would be something else. I mean this dude seems like one of your boys who would be fighting if they were going for the middleweight championship. Eats dinner at his parents, trains in his hometown, has the same trainer that he has had since he was 9, i mean he is one down to earth dude. Even though i have posted on here and belive that taylor will win by ko, i really dont care who wins this fight.