does valuev owe holyfield a rematch????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Dec 24, 2008.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    ???????????????????????/:smoke
     
  2. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    230
    Jun 2, 2007
    Sure he does. Holyfield beat him but got robbed. It was boring but you don't have to watch it.
     
  3. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    There needs to be a rematch just can't leave it at that IMO.
     
  4. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    Yeah, he does. I haven't seen the fight yet, but was it a pro Valuev crowd?
     
  5. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    32,065
    3,384
    Apr 16, 2005
    True dat.

    There should be an immediate rematch, however, at this point.
     
  6. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,045
    Jan 29, 2005
    I didn't see the fight, but if Holy did as well as everyone says, he certainly deserves a rematch.
     
  7. Valuev dosen't owe Holy jack ****, Felix Sturm and Axel schultz didn't get rematches when they were robbed here in the USA:-(
    Both holy and Valuev were pathetic the ref should have did a double DQ AND DECLARED A NO CONTEST:thumbsup
    I don't feel bad for Holy if he dosen't want to get ripped off,, fight here in the USA but he's to damn stubborn, he can't get licensed here so live with the Bull**** that happens when you fight clear accross the World!!!:yep:hey
     
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    He owes it to himself. He's a professional fighter, he must feel the need to be vindicated.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    There's talk of it happening.
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    I have not seen this match up but from what I understand about it. I should try to find a link to it when I decide to try and get some sleep. If this is not the case let me know but if it is tha i don't care how bad of a robbery it is boxing dose not need a rematch of this match up.
     
  11. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Vauev lost.
    Holyfield is the new WBA Champion. No rematch needed. The WBA had to make the real step.
     
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    No doubt it will be a James Toney vs. Samuel Peter type affair. Robbed in the first fight, the aged veteran won't be able to pull it off again in the rematch, losing twice in a case where he should only have had to win once. Such is life.
     
  13. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    Definitely should have a rematch.

    But I don't think it'll happen. Because I reckon Chagaev will beat Valuev again anyway to become the full WBA champion again, and Valuev without a belt doesn't interest Holyfield.

    And Chagaev with the WBA belt shouldn't interest Holyfield either, horrible style for Holy.
     
  14. NBT

    NBT Mοderator of Death Full Member

    2,605
    5
    Mar 9, 2006
    No thanks, the first fight was bad enough, I don't need to see more of these disgusting "performances".