Valuev dosen't owe Holy jack ****, Felix Sturm and Axel schultz didn't get rematches when they were robbed here in the USA:-( Both holy and Valuev were pathetic the ref should have did a double DQ AND DECLARED A NO CONTEST:thumbsup I don't feel bad for Holy if he dosen't want to get ripped off,, fight here in the USA but he's to damn stubborn, he can't get licensed here so live with the Bull**** that happens when you fight clear accross the World!!!:yep:hey
I have not seen this match up but from what I understand about it. I should try to find a link to it when I decide to try and get some sleep. If this is not the case let me know but if it is tha i don't care how bad of a robbery it is boxing dose not need a rematch of this match up.
No doubt it will be a James Toney vs. Samuel Peter type affair. Robbed in the first fight, the aged veteran won't be able to pull it off again in the rematch, losing twice in a case where he should only have had to win once. Such is life.
Definitely should have a rematch. But I don't think it'll happen. Because I reckon Chagaev will beat Valuev again anyway to become the full WBA champion again, and Valuev without a belt doesn't interest Holyfield. And Chagaev with the WBA belt shouldn't interest Holyfield either, horrible style for Holy.
No thanks, the first fight was bad enough, I don't need to see more of these disgusting "performances".