That depends on how the fight actually goes. If the fight is very close and Canelo gets the decision, then robbery will be the explanation chosen. Referee biased interference might also be a cause for saying that it was robbery. If GGG performs much differently than in the past and is either KOD or TKOD, then being over the hill will probably be used.
Floyd all day Wards wins over Froch are A+, Kessler* (headbutts), Kov 1 was a gift decision, Kov 2 I'll give him credit but even that fight has to have a little * due to the repeated ball crushing
Well, give me only one reason that justifies why Ward's resume is comparable with the one of best boxer of the century. Ward resume is full of asterisks and controversia. Floyd's one is impolute, I have no problems with people saying Castillo, DLH or Maidana could have got a win vs him, I even think Maidana won that first fight, but haters always try to dismiss Floyd's legacy and they even say that he lost to Canelo or Pacquiao, they also try to compare his record to this nutcracker. That s a bunch of crap
Not even remotely close. Fmj beat legitimate great fighters. I feel froch being your best win doesn't hold fmj jock, just imho which is the only one that means anything
Without a shadow of a doubt. Ward has the balls to fight prime top p4p fighters which is not the case for Mayweather.
Just the fact that you ended your comment with "this nutcracker" shows youre bias. At the end of the day Ward has two wins against a prime Kovalev who is a great fighter whom people seem to pathetically be jumping off his bandwagon and calling him overrated and lazy etc. Ward beat guys that werent as accomplished but were prime or very near prime and he also gave up some size by moving up in weight. Also his career isnt over yet. If he goes on to beat some more high quality guys he definitely improves his case. Imho im more impressed with his resume over FlIVds but as i said thats just my opinion.