Donaire better than PAC ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Sep 27, 2007.


  1. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    .... after he KO Arce?

    Two wins over the former/current top dogs ...
    this sounds better than PAC after his two first bouts with Barrera and Morales.
     
  2. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Arce career almost over ... same with Morales at that time.
     
  3. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    for me donaire is a good "general" to say the least bec. he sticked to his fightplan: lefthook, lefthook, lefthook.
    in terms of style him and pac are a lot different. donaire being a defensive/slick boxer and pac being a slugger. however to say that donaire is better than pac after beating arce(if ever) is way overboard. are you saying accomplishments on the flyweight? if it is, i can agree with you since pac, although had many fights in flyweight, fought a good name only in sasakul for the wbc title, although a good name, if compared with darch, he is no match in resume and accomplishments.
    if donaire "wins" against arce and you want to compare it with pac's whole career donaire still has a long way to go. arce might be a future atg but howbout darch? he is good but i don't think darch can be an atg. :nono
    pac fought future atg's in em , mab, and might even be jmm although the latter on draw. nevertheless those 3 alone can never be compared to donaire's darch win or an " arce" win.
    therefore career wise if he wins against arce: the answer is still no.
    but if flyweight resume is compared, i have to agree with you: yes.
     
  4. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    pac acclomplished way more...donaire on the right track tho
     
  5. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,939
    1,168
    Jul 20, 2004
    This is a joke right.:yikes
     
  6. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
  7. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    nope..Pac went thru the ranks before he got his share of the limelight, he's fought great fighters in the lower weights too... it was because of him that filipino fighters are given these opportunities. Too early to say, but a great performance nevertheless.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    No, Pac's titles in numerous weight classes and wins over Barrera and Morales would still put him ahead of Nonito. But if Nonito was able to beat Arce and add to his resume which includes Darchinyan, he would be on that same path, but he wouldn't quite be at Pac's level.

    I don't know how much Arce has left...
     
  9. etong_08

    etong_08 Active Member Full Member

    690
    0
    May 1, 2007
    I somehow agree with that. He's one tough fighter--handspeed, footwork, and strength on both hands. Still got some more fights to prove though.
     
  10. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    He may be comparable in the future but on what each fighter has achieved so far Pac is better.
     
  11. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Mad, I just compare Donaire (if he KO Arce) with PAC after his first big fights with Barrera and Morales.
    If you guys do not remember Morales beat PAC the first time, so KO over Vic and Arce
    may be bigger achievement than beating Barrera and losing to Morales,
    no matter that PAC was already recognized before he step up the competition.

    Comparing their overall achievemnts do not have any sense since Donaire have only 20 or so fights
    and there is really not too many fighters at that weight class at the same level as MAB and Morales.

    Also if you think about whole career, then you should wait a week so maybe
    you will see PAC career differently after MAB KO him in two rounds.:!:
     
  12. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    FIRST TWO FIGHTS ok i get it.
    but mab is way bigger than vic and arce combined even if you say that pac lost to em. :deal
     
  13. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Thats the whole picture isn't clear, I want the ansfer from you whether
    you think or not that beating Vic and Arce (supposedly with KO)
    is bigger or not with beating MAB and losing to Morales?

    We really don't know what will happen with PAC Oct 6 and what will
    do Donairie later, I just compare them at similar point of their careers.
     
  14. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    nope. i already told you that mab is still bigger than arce and darch.
    that loss by pac to em anyways. was a close ud so there's nothing to be ashamed of from there if im pac. you know what happened to the trilogy.
    so even if pac has a lost it's ok, mab is a future atg, arce might be one but in terms of accomplishments mab still beats him.
    so is darch, in nowhere he is comparable to mab in terms of resume.
    in quantity if ever , donaire wins against arce, he has it(2w and 0l 2kos) while pac has 1-1 1ko against 2 atgs. in quantity pac has it.
    pac ko's mab alone beats those 2 wins by ko of donaire easily. :nono
     
  15. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    But lose is a lose.

    If you mutiply win over Barrera by two then it equals to two wins over Vic and Arce
    but the lose to Morales even close diminish PAC score a little.

    So two good wins against one great win and one lose.