Donaire said Mijares will be an easy fight!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PacDbest, Apr 6, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. El Puma

    El Puma between rage and serenity Full Member

    4,310
    2
    Jan 8, 2006
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:roflF'n sweetness
     
  2. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Fight wasn't even close, another case of moronic judging. 8-4 Guzman.

    Do you think your preferance in Linares could even beat Barrios?
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Fight wasn't even close eh? More evidence that you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
     
  4. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I know exactly what I am talking about, your scorecards have been suspect in the past, it's no surprise here. Very clear win for Guzman.

    But allow me to continue.

    Do you feel as if Linares could beat Barrios now? Apparantley Barrios is some crap fighter, despite only losing to Freitas in a very close fight and Guzman at the top level. Barrios is quite a decent fighter, avoided and dangerous, he swats other B levels like they are nothing.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    which of my scorecards have been suspect? Sounds to me like you're reaching. I actually have really good scorecards, and usually pick out the right winner even when most fans have the scoring wrong
     
  6. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    This is true. Donaire as I said in my Prediction Thread with the Darch upset is a Celebral fighter. I even call him the Pinoy Mayweather minus the Big mouth.
     
  7. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    You have scored bouts to where it favour's your guy, I try to score them in unbiased fashion. If you really scored Guzman-Barrios as a non-decisive victory for Guzman then it highlights this.

    Now I am fairly sure that you were the one posting the rbr for Peter-Toney 1 and the person who did had it a near shutout for Peter, ridiculous scoring, if this isn't you I apologise.

    Lastly, you scored Pac-JMM to favour Pac, when everybody who scored it really unbiased had it at least 2 points clear for JMM and maybe said 'you can make a case for Pac'.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Off topic, but how did you score that fight?

    115-112 Toney is how I saw it the last time I watched it.
     
  9. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    hahaha ROFL... That is some packed up sh*t right there...
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    :lol: dude you are on crack.

    I scored the first Toney vs Peter fight 9 rounds to 3 for Peter, and no, I am definately NOT a Peter fan. I'm a MUCH bigger fan of Toney than Peter. I don't even like Peter. It just so happens i saw the fight as 9 rounds to 3 for Peter and it turned out that so did most of the judges at ringside.

    As for the Pac-JMM fight wtf are you talking about?!
    stfu
    stfu again! are serious?

    it seems you live in some kind of ****ed up world where biased = not in agreement with Amsterdam's pre-conceived opinion

    I don't remember my scorecard for Guzman vs Barrios but i do remember it was a close fight. I am not biased either way for or against Guzman and actually see Molitor beating Beltran more convincingly than Guzman as a great accomplishment for Molitor rather than a knock on Guzman.

    As for Larios and Barrios, Larios is definately the better between the two.
     
  11. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Plus he was uncomfortable and weight drained at 122 at the time.

    That fight definitely wasn't 8-4, let alone 7-5. Also, the scorecard for Barrios was despicable. Many judges seem to have something against Guzman because he clowns around. :-(

    Hopefully Barrios will beat Juarez and make people think higher of him. Who are you picking in that fight? I think Juarez is going to be in an all out war against a top 10 level fighter for the first time in his career and if Barrios is in the same kind of condition that he was in during the Guzman fight, he should be favored. Juarez will have trouble fighting effectively off the backfoot and unlike Barrios, who's relentless in every round, he sometimes fights in spurts and lets his opponents outwork him. It will be interesting to see Juarez matched up against such an offensive, powerful fighter. He has a great chin and to last 12 rounds like he did against Marquez he's shown great heart, but I think he might break down in the later stages of a fight against Barrios. I'm still 50/50 on this fight and I'm worried about Barrios at 130 right now.
     
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Same, 115-112 Toney, clear as day as well.
     
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    What the are you talking about.. EVERYBODY!!!???!!!!
    You can have your own scoring if you want but what matters most is
    what the judges score.

    Now, you also believe the judges were incompetent or paid? Pls don't use EVERYBODY or the PEOPLE..

    None of us represents the people. We are all individuals who represent ourselves..
     
  14. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    i guess he meant everybody who lost their bets:yep
     
  15. Bystander

    Bystander Sensible Kibitzer Full Member

    552
    0
    Apr 2, 2008

    strong words, bold prediction.:lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.