Pacquiao would have lost to Rigondeux too and there is no guarantee he could have beaten Walters either. People act like Pacquiao strolled all the way up to 140 undefeated without any losses or tough fights. Did you actually follow the same career of Pacquiao that I did? Donaire might or might not be able to do well at 140 but really it depends on who is at 140 and on whether or not he can improve his defense. He's not going to do well brawling but he is fast with enough power to beat a lot of guys. I think we should wait and see before comparing Donaire to Pacquiao but I think Donaire has the talent and physical capabilities to easily fill out at 140. Whether or not he can do that and win is anyones guess.
It's tough to keep moving up division after division but people comparing Donaire to Pacquiao need to put both in context. Who did Donaire fight in the middle of a 1 win 6 loss slump, or coming off wars and brain surgery, who did he rob to get a win against. Pacquiao was more lucky than good to have beaten faded legends to go against Donaire is moving up fighting prime fighters at there best
:think I thought Pac was devastating against leftovers at catchweights? :hey :rofl *****s, they're are confusing, really :rofl
how many pure ko's did pacquiao have with ariza? Just one, with the hatton fight, the cotto stoppage was bullshito
I've never said that I thought Pac was 100% on PED's, but for the so called biggest fight of all time why not do some of the best testing. In a fight of that magnitude both fighter undergoing advanced testing showing the two best fighters are clean would only bring a positive light to the sport. I don't think anybody who thinks Pac was on PEDs is due to anything "you know who" said, it has more to do with him turning down testing repeatedly from multiple fighters. In your opinion what negative would have come from Manny testing?