Donald Curry or Terry Norris

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Commander Vader, Nov 1, 2010.


  1. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    I agree but to be fair neither had long careers it's like they burnt out too soon.
     
  2. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    I also think that Norris is a H2H nightmare especially against those that couldn't bang. Like you said, if you can't hurt him you're in trouble.
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    He didn't really look like he was drawn into anything in that fight. His chin was just, well, "Terrible", and he looked clueless in there. Credit to him for boxing smart in the rematch, but the fact remains he should've never had any problems with a more or less washed up Welter like Brown.

    To answer the question: my personal preference is easily Curry, if that wasn't obvious enough from my above paragraph.
     
  4. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    I have to disagree here on both counts.
     
  5. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    :deal
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Well what I mean is Norris could exchange punches and was more confortable doing it than Donald. Donald was a sharp counterpuncher, which would not have been great for Terry when Donald was prime. If Terry had a jab which could hit Donald it would have countered a little Donald's counterpunching, but most guys could not counter Donald. Incidentally, Milton McCrory for being 6-1, only had a 73 inch reach, shorter than Leonard's (74) or Hagler's (75). So McCrory was tall but the reach was not that great. Hearns on the other had had a 78 inch reach. I think Norris had a 73 inch reach if I am not mistaken.
     
  7. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    :oops: Actually, I think his reach was only 68.

    I hear you man, but I still gotta go with Norris on this. I might be a little biased, he's one of my 3 favorite fighters.
     
  8. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    well I see your point in that Terry had speed which was the greatest thing he did have. Donald in his prime was so great. Terry would have to almost hurt Donald in the first round before Donald got his rhythm. The fight they had in Palm Springs in 1991 was brutal. Donald gave a good accounting of himself.
     
  9. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Curry did give a hell of an account of himself that night past prime. Would have been a barn burner either way I think, but yea, if Curry got into rhythm it would e big trouble for the terrible one.
     
  10. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    i wanna get a Mike McCallum DVD career set :happy
     
  11. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    i read this thread as donald curry or chuck norris, which is way cooler