Donald Curry v Lloyd Honeyghan

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Oct 23, 2009.


  1. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Clearly not, as Honeyghan owned Curry that night! The night where The Cobra was considered by some the finest in the world, and by many second only to the Marvelous one... Curry was very much primed.
     
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    And you have PROOF POSITIVE that this is what Hagler was planning?Or is it as you said that most people believed this?
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,433
    9,421
    Jul 15, 2008
    When Curry lost toHoneygan it was a huge upset. At the time he was considered possibly the best pound for pound fighter in the world. His victories over Starling, his crushing of McCrory were so impressive many thought he was here to stay. We should have known something was up with him by the way he basically quit in that fight. He just packed it in ... obviously he would never be the same.
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Hagler/HearnsII was very much pencilled in after their fights with Mugabi and Shuler; but then his arrogance turned it all on its head, by announcing his comeback.
     
  5. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    That's true, but no one knows if those things actually were worse for Curry at that time; they just assumed it must've been just because he lost. For all we know, he was no more "weight drained" than he was for any fight he won before that.
     
  6. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    We already saw that he wasn't.
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005

    No, I don't have proof positive (I didn't say I did!!) but yes thats what a lot of people in boxing believed would happen at the time (which is what I said in my post). Hagler-Hearns II was a cert to happen though.


    I'm guessing you're a Hagler fan....?
     
  8. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    ESB ALL Time Welterweight Rankings Poll:

    1. 1049 Sugar Ray Robinson (41)
    2. 524 Sugar Ray Leonard
    3. 322 Henry Armstrong
    4. 301 Jose Napoles
    5. 275 Kid Gavilan
    6. 207 Emile Griffith
    7. 174 Tommy Hearns
    8. 129 Luis Rodriguez
    9. 111 Barbados Joe Walcott
    10. 87 Mickey Walker
    11. 66 Roberto Duran
    12. 53 Carmen Basillo
    13. 47 Charles Burley
    14. 42 Jack Britton
    15. 39 Tommy Ryan (1)
    16. 26 Sam Langford (1)
    17. 25 Pernell Whitaker
    18. 24 Don Curry
    19. 21 Jimmy Mclarnin
    20. 19 [tie] Felix Trinidad
    20. 19 [tie] Barney Ross
    22. 15 Peter Jackson
    23. 12 Ted Kid Lewis
    24. 11 Oscar De La Hoya
    25. 10 [tie] Jack Dempsey
    25. 10 [tie] Pipino Cuevas
    27. 8 Miguel Cotto
    28. 7 Sugar Shane Mosley
    29. 5 [tie] Wilfred Benitez
    29. 5 [tie] Carlos Palomino
    31. 4 Marlon Sterling
    32. 3 Aaron Davis
    33. 2 [tie] Isufu Quartey
    33. 2 [tie] Jose Lopez
    35. 1 Floyd Mayweather Jr.

    That's a damn solid list. Honeyghan is nowhere to be found. Hell, Aaron Davis even made it on the scoreboard. So obviously the majority doesn't believe Honeyghan beat Curry at his best or he'd damn sure be rated somewhere. Curry was a shell of his best at welterweight when he fought Honeyghan. Honeyghan's future results (unspectacular) kind of backs that up too. Just for perspective, I don't make excuses for Curry vs McCallum. I don't write it off as a lucky punch. I believe Curry would've had problems with his eye closing late in the fight and I also believe that some body work by McCallum was going to affect Curry eventually. But for Honeyghan, no way was he as good as or better than Curry. I'd liken it to Richie Sandoval beating a faded Jeff Chandler.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,846
    44,555
    Apr 27, 2005
    Twice Curry victim Marlon Starling seemed to handle him just fine

    ;)

    :good
     
  10. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    pesonally ,i read it in the ring magazine:good
     
  11. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,511
    12,970
    Feb 2, 2006
    Funny cause Mills Lane saw Curry in between bouts and said he was not controling his weight.
    Curry was drained in the Honeyghan bout simple as that.And Honeyghan DECLINED a rematch with Curry years latter at jr.middle.
     
  12. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Starling put big mouth Honeyghan in his place anyhow.

    Don Curry had already moved up in weight had'nt he? but decided to go back down to fight Honeyghan, even though his manager told him not to, that is what i heard.

    Curry did not have to be the best of shape to beat McCroy though did he? its not like it was a grueling long fight lol
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah i've got a qulaity photo in a book of the Bumphus one. I've actually got Bumphus vs Hatcher on vid as well. Just thought i'd add that!
     
  14. Raggamuffin

    Raggamuffin You dipstick Full Member

    728
    14
    Jun 11, 2007
    loved Lloyd, hence my nickname here on the forum
    Always busy and a chip on his shoulder the size of a London dubbledeckerbus
     
  15. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Donald was hurt by his weight problems against Lloyd, though give Lloyd credit, he took advantage, and was a good fighter.But if that fight with Milton had lasted, McCrory may have beaten him.Donald should seek out Ray even today, and whip his ass.