Donald Curry vs. Thomas Hearns

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Luigi1985, Aug 25, 2007.


  1. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    Who wins at 154 lbs and why?
     
  2. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    Prime CURRY 1982 - 85 or the post honeygham curry
     
  3. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006


    prime-4-prime
     
  4. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    Curry would of been a fight for everyone in history

    He was still very good when mccallum ko'd him. You can't take credit away from the body snatcher, it was a greatly timed punch.

    Curry was boxing great in that fight before that punch

    My prediction at 154 in 1986 -87: Hearns KO 10
     
  5. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    Hearns on points. Mccallum was a great body puncher, that why he ko'd cuury. hearns wouldn't of been able to find those opening because of his height but he would of outboxed donald behind his jab

    Every ordinary skilled fighter should copy donald curry. he was a dream idol for trainers all over the world to teach there boxers
     
  6. jackiebrown

    jackiebrown Member Full Member

    498
    2
    Jul 13, 2007
    curry was crazy wicked in his prime .. should have been a super fight for hagler instead of mugabi .. but i guess he just got drained out and lost to honeyghan ..

    hearns was bad ass but he was just leggy .. a couple good shots to his jaw or temple he gets wobbley ... you just never know putting him head to head with other greats
     
  7. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hearns' power is too much for Curry. I think Curry would be served fighting Hearns inside, and he'd have to take some heavy artillery getting there, thats for sure. Curry has excellent ability from the outside, but Hearns' height and reach combined with his lightning fast jab would mean Curry would come off second best from long range. Hearns' would have to be patient while breaking up Curry's defense, as his high guard picked off punches very well. Curry kept his elbows tucked in tightly as well to defend bodyshots.

    Hearns KO8
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,765
    44,337
    Apr 27, 2005
    Hearns is Curry's worst nightmare. I'd be looking for an early night here, anywhere in the first 3 or 4.
     
  9. Black Eyes To You

    Black Eyes To You Alaskan Forever Full Member

    375
    1
    Apr 4, 2005
  10. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,111
    17,651
    Apr 26, 2006
    Curry on points for me....
     
  11. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    371
    Dec 30, 2005
    Despite the fact that Hearns was never outboxed? Bold predicition as I think Curry's only chance is to stop Tommy. However, I see Tommy stopping Curry anywhere between rounds 3 to 8. Curry doesn't have the granite chin needed to resist Hearns at probably his best weight.
     
  12. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,434
    12,866
    Feb 2, 2006
    And what drainig bodypunches was Mccallum landing on Curry?Curry was easily outboxing Mccallum and Curry wasn't even at his sharpest!
     
  13. boxbible

    boxbible Active Member Full Member

    991
    14
    Aug 6, 2004
    Easily outboxing McCallum???

    He was barely outboxing McCallum. It wasn't easy, and it was draining.
     
  14. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    great statement/
    . curry was outscoring mccallum but he wasn't beating him easily
     
  15. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Thomas Hearns mid-round TKO