Don't be ignorant

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Jun 13, 2009.


  1. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,120
    2,890
    Apr 17, 2009
    Cotto won the fight, even if you thought he didn't it would have been close and he fought with 1 ****ing eye! If he didn't have that problem he would have won comfortably.
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    32,089
    3,409
    Apr 16, 2005
    I though he won pretty clearly 115-112, but I could easily see 114-113. I find it hard to argue that Clottey won, however.
     
  3. strongarm

    strongarm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    3
    Dec 5, 2008
    I thought clottey clearly won the fight.
     
  4. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    Can't be ignorant when the facts clearly showed Clottey won that fight, though it was thisclose.

    He came back and proved his worth as a top notch fighter.
     
  5. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004
    Sorry but anyone stating that Cotto won clearly is ludacris. This was a razor thin close fight, 114-113 someone. Period.
     
  6. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    How?

    Lost the first rd 10-8, gave away the last four.

    Assuming he wont he rest, which he clearly didn't, he still couldn't have clearly won, could he?
     
  7. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Dude I don't know how Ludacris had this fight, in fact I didn't even know he followed boxing.

    Boxing is scored over 12 stanzas, one 10-9 goes in the books the same as another 10-9.