Dont be surprised if the Broner vs Marcos M. fight is ruled an NC!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, Dec 19, 2013.


  1. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    Damn......some **** you should just keep to yourself. I have no idea how you could have watched that fight and had it for Broner? The boy took a beating but he did show some grit, heart and determination. That don't mean he won. It just means that he took his beating like a champ.
     
  2. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    yo Adrien. you didn't do it!!!
     
  3. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    gbp has a contract with usada and usada did what was told them in the floyd positive test.

    :think...this could get interesting.
     
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
  5. @Killawhaledale

    @Killawhaledale New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Dec 16, 2013

    Haha true story
     
  6. stillth3sameg

    stillth3sameg Woolly Rhino Full Member

    1,896
    0
    Sep 16, 2009
    what is this trash of a thread
     
  7. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    you scored it for broner, eh? :smoke
     
  8. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    no

    gbp is moving on and dropping broner down to 140 as he doesnt have the power to deal with 147 right now

    trying to change the decision to a nc means the end result would be a rematch and anyone who thinks thats happening anytime soon doesnt understand boxing

    if maidana were to beat that ass again, back-to-back, broner would probably be meldrick taylor finished if he is not already

    that second knockdown was a finisher as it eliminated any and all doubt on the validity of the first knockdown
     
  9. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    I don't think they were pills, just the q-tip things for stopping cuts.
     
  10. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    faking that a head rubbing against your face severely injured you is taking your beating like a chump.
     
  11. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    Why do you think it's unreasonable to claim loaded gloves for the Cotto fight? Unlike for Maidana, there is hard evidence Margarito was engaging in this kind of illegal behaviour elsewhere in his career.
     
  12. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    you're confusing hard evidence with the circumstantial variety. :nono
     
  13. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,180
    18,604
    Jul 19, 2004
    This fight and the Klitschko/Peters 1 aren't the same. The only rnds Peter won were the ones he knocked down Wlad. He lost all the other rnds looking for the KO and not doing ****.

    Maidana hurt Broner early and never step of the gas. He went to the body and head all 12 rnds.
     
  14. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    Wakd won......but Sam made it close due to the KD's. Physically Peters imposed his will but Wald was able to hold and bang his way to Decision winning enough rounds to negate the knock downs. I think I had up by 2 rounds.....maybe 3. It wasn't a fun fight to watch.
     
  15. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,180
    18,604
    Jul 19, 2004
    Broner lost and would have lost bigger if the ref was competent. :deal

    Maidana never stop landing punches. There were a few rnds that Broner had success but for the rest of the rnds he was ineffective and getting the better of the trade between the two.