Don't fight the best in your division, move up & fight a shot fighter & you're P4P#1!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Nov 15, 2008.


  1. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    As long as Pacman takes his punishment to the bitter end, as if it were the most important fight of his career, I'll have no complaints. But if he quits, telling himself it's not worth it, just because he realises he's in too deep, against a much bigger opponent, I'm done with him. You've made your bed, then sleep in it. A challenge is not big enough if it's so big that you can fail and completely and still pretend you achieved something. Anyone could step into the ring with a prime Tyson and lose in ten seconds. That takes fewer guts than getting into the ring with someone you could go 10-12 rounds with, who could beat you up properly, leaving you damaged for life e.g. Benn v. G-man.:good
     
  2. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Oh, I know. He's in there for the money, no doubt, and I demand he earns his paycheck.

    Still -- I hope these kinds of fights don't become a trend. Pac is capable enough, but it is a bit dangerous to match fighters like this.
     
  3. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    So DLH is good enough for Margo & Williams but too shot for Pac? And if he's not too shot for Pac and Pac has a shot what is wrong with the fight. Another obssesion with weight classes.
     
  4. The Mighty Bolo

    The Mighty Bolo Active Member Full Member

    696
    0
    Aug 13, 2008
    Arum backed out of the fight before the DLH dream match was in the making. Campbell even agreed to fight him in the Phillipines. Nate would KO Pac.
     
  5. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,478
    1,737
    Nov 20, 2007
    Of course it's not a walk in the park for Manny! Of course it's a huge risk, our poll suggests 55% think he'll lose, the most voted by knockout!

    But how stupid is to put yourself in such a crazy situation: instead of fighting the elite in your weight-class for titles (JMM, Campbell), you jump up big, BUT vs. someone who doesn't belong to the title elite anymore and clearly over the hill. So no title, no prime fighter, just moving up, and that alone is little to give historical credit for.

    You can still move up for the money, it's your call, just don't look for any kind of huge recongition! I don't even recognise the effort of jumping up, as the risk is only in 'moving up', not 'whom against'. 24/7 will be about the horrific threat DLH will offer, but close to 2009, DLH is not offering a horrible threat. Margarito, Williams, Clottey, Cotto, the WW elite offers a horrible threat, DLH offers paycheck.

    Others think PacMan is just taking a dive for the paycheck, and don't see the decline of DLH. Well... why would you put yourself in a situation to lose and to lose to an old man outside of your weight-class? It's not even brave. It's 'okay, I'll fight a big man, but please don't bring the elite, but an old man with money.'



    Marco Antonio Barrera would probably be the favorite vs. Juan Manuel Lopez. And what? History made again? Give me a break! In reality, history is fighting Vazquez - or bigger history is fighting Juan Manuel Marquez, which is something no one can ask from Lopez. But fighting an old Marco Antonio Barrera at 130 is just not really significant historically. It's all about the money and making it LOOK LIKE significant while it's not.

    For those who think there's history to gain in December, HBO's hype machine has already won, and 24/7 has yet to kick off! :patsch
     
  6. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    This is one smart dude right here man.
    You're killin em in the threads. Great post bro.
     
  7. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    he weighed 146 fight night....that is much dif than weighing in at 147 the night before...if that were the case arturo gatti should have been fighting iddleweight when he was 140....what would that look like
     
  8. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    This content is protected
    Ignore them ..they're obviously scared Pac might pull an upset over Hoya and lose their bets
     
  9. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    I agree that this fight sucks though for both guys
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    I can see three clear points you're making --

    1) Pac's reason for taking this fight is money, not legacy.
    2) DLH is old and not one of the top welterweights.

    This was already apparant to most of us. I disagree, however with the third.

    3) Because DLH is not a top welterweight this is not a historically significant fight.

    It would be a mean feat to win. Twelve-round fights are much easier on oldies as the fifteen-rounders of yore. Look at Hopkins and what he has accomplished at an extremely advanced age -- now DLH is nowhere near the gymrat Hop is, nor does he fight in a style that is as suitable, but he's still very much more capable than the picture you paint.

    I feel you are underestimating DLH's capabilities. I originally hated this fight because I felt DLH would never do something as gruesome as this -- I still do, to some extent -- and I now find myself faced with people belittling Pac's achievement if he were to win before the match is fought.

    The glory is there to be had. You might rather see him fight someone else, but they don't offer as much money. I don't think there's anyone in the sport that would turn down a fight against DLH.
     
  11. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    not to mention there is nothing wrong with making the most money u can if u are pacman...the guy has been in wars and this will be an entertaining fight just not a lagacy definer...but he has proven his worth..
     
  12. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    That's a slight. Manny Pac (much like FMJ was) is already secure in his legacy. 7 combined wins over Morales, Barrera and Marquez is enough for a "legacy."

    You mention him fighting the elites of his weight class. No **** pal. Everyone wants to see him fight the likes of Campbell, Diaz, JMM and the ilk...but let's not act like Manny is moving up in weight for some sort of gimme fight. He's moving up in weight to fight a guy whose STILL dangerous and a threat to anyone in boxing from 154 down. You can say he's over the hill (and I agree with that) but he's been over the hill since the 2nd Mosley loss. It doesn't discredit Hopkins for beating him or Floyd for beating him. He's not shot, he's past his prime...there's a BIG difference.

    You're going hard to discredit Oscar De La Hoya. Really hard. I'd give Oscar a fighting shot against any of the "elites" at WW..even though the truth is there IS no elite at WW.

    If you don't feel that there's any historical significance then hey sure that's all up to you...but the fact is when HISTORY is all set and done, IF Pac were to defeat Oscar..it'd be his greatest win. THAT is what history would dictacte.
     
  13. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    :good
     
  14. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    :good
     
  15. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    OWNED!

    Good post!