Don't The Earlier Rounds Count Anymore

:roll:

 

I agree, no way was that a unanimous either way.

Nowadays you could probably win the first ten rounds, and lose the last two and lose the fight. Some judges seem to have very short memories.

 

i thought the judges were supposed to be on taylors side?

 

Compubox is FAR from accurate.

Take the number's with a grain of salt.

It could have gone either way.

 

Whether its unanimous is irrelevent, the 3 judges don't get together and say "Thats was a close fight, we'll give a split decision".

You either agree with a score or not...

 

I agree 100%. I watched this fight in a club. Therefore, I wasn't able to hear the crowd or the commentators. This allowed me to view the fight without any bias. There were a couple of rounds were Pavlik was hitting Jermain's gloves the whole round and still outlanded him according to compubox somehow. I was giving Pavlik the benefit of the doubt and still had Jermain up 7-5.

 

I had Pavlik winning 7-5, but pretty clearly.

 

:good

Telling it like it is.

 

Ok then, I do not agree with the score.

 

I can't believe there are people acting like this was some kind of robbery!

JT was given an edge in his fights against BHop and Spinks (JT's worst ever performance)--all 3 fights could've gone either way (I had them all as draws); and enough to hold on to his title (I agreed) against Winky based on being busier--the same reason people scored last night for KP.

I like KP and JT, I think they're both good for boxing and likable guys. KP just did a little more, no shame in JT's performance.

 

This content is protected

 

unless you post a round by round with a detailed description of how you saw each round and who you gave it to then these threads are meaningless.