Dont you love it when **** boxers are finally exposed?....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by crazyboy867, Nov 23, 2008.


Page 1 of 5
  1. crazyboy867

    crazyboy867 Active Member Full Member

    573
    0
    Aug 18, 2005
    i hate when people say this boxer is good because his record shows that he is undefeated or whatever. what they dont know is that all of their oppositions were ****. and whenever they stepped up to the next level of fighters they get brutally exposed by KTFO!

    perfect examples:

    Jeff Lacy MANHANDLED by Calzaghe!
    Amir Khan got KTFO ROUND 1!
    Steve Molitor got KTFO ROUND 4!
    Miguel Cotto got HIS ASS BEAT DOWN by Margarito! (will be exposed again in a rematch or in a fight with floyd)
    Antonio Tarver EMBARASSED by Hopkins!
    Sam Peter LOSSES to Klitschko brothers!
    Zab Judah KTFO by Tszyu/Cotto, PICKED APART by Mayweather, EMBARASSING LOSS to Baldomir!

    Fighters who will eventually be exposed:

    Paul Williams (will eventually happen, you all know it)
    Kelly Pavlik (already semi exposed by B-Hop)
    Joe Calzaghe (if he ever mans up and fights Chad Dawson)
    David Haye (when he fights Wlad-will end in KTFO)
    Ricky Hatton (although i like him, he will get exposed again at WW if he fights another true contender)
     
    crazyboy867, Nov 23, 2008
    crazyboy867, Nov 23, 2008
    #1
  2. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Well, the only thing wrong about your post is... Khan, Cotto & Tarver dont fit into the list "****" boxers. And Pavliks loss was worse than the Cotto lost, but you dont consider him "FULLY" exposed?
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    #2
  3. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I don't even know why I'm responding to this bull****.

    I'm a Boxing fan, I don't take pleasure in fighters getting a beatdown to often.

    There is a misconception that if a fighter loses one fight nowadays then he is exposed? I don't believe that.

    Miguel Cotto is still a world class operator, who just found himself in a highly competitive matchup. He came out second best on that night, but I expect him to make a comeback and look as good as ever.

    There are no perfect fighters, it's effectively trial and error. You lose, you get in the gym and you try and nullify those mistakes.
     
    Addie, Nov 23, 2008
    Addie, Nov 23, 2008
    #3
  4. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
    I enjoyed Mijares getting exposed

    Guzman
    Linares
    Bute
    Diaconu
    Froch


    will get exposed soon enough as well
     
    Boom_Boom, Nov 23, 2008
    Boom_Boom, Nov 23, 2008
    #4
  5. djoc175

    djoc175 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,892
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    why can a fighter not lose without being labelled as 'exposed'??
     
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    #5
  6. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Scratch Guzman from that list, & I totally agree with you.
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    #6
  7. FromWithin

    FromWithin Living for the city Full Member

    2,538
    0
    Feb 22, 2008
    Dawson will be exposed.
     
    FromWithin, Nov 23, 2008
    FromWithin, Nov 23, 2008
    #7
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Mijares isn't a "****" boxer so therefore he doesn't really qualify for this painfully disrespectful and misinformed thread.
     
    Addie, Nov 23, 2008
    Addie, Nov 23, 2008
    #8
  9. djoc175

    djoc175 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,892
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    who do you think will expose froch??just out of interest
     
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    #9
  10. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007

    so what your telling me is ...

    you would rather a fighter lose then win
     
    walk with me, Nov 23, 2008
    walk with me, Nov 23, 2008
    #10
  11. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    This clown is stupid, he just wanted some attention
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    #11
  12. crazyboy867

    crazyboy867 Active Member Full Member

    573
    0
    Aug 18, 2005
    i rather see a fighter who is being protected by his managers/promoters lose when he up against a true fighter...that way you can see his true abilities.
     
    crazyboy867, Nov 23, 2008
    crazyboy867, Nov 23, 2008
    #12
  13. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Man, I know you not defending that fool. Hopkins could move down & expose him
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 23, 2008
    #13
  14. djoc175

    djoc175 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,892
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    You have contradicted yourself here by putting Cotto in the list of '****' fighters and in the list of 'next level' opposition?!?!?Further evidence that you are truly helpless
     
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    djoc175, Nov 23, 2008
    #14
  15. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    so what fighter is not protected by his managers/promoters by your standards?

    every fighter you named is a beast

    cotto fought everyone under the sun that he could and hes still young
    paul williams has fought everyone under the sun that he could
    tarver fought everyone under the sun that he could
    pavlik has fought everyone that he could and hes still young
    david haye has fought everyone that he could
    same peter & zab as well....

    i hate to use this term... but it seriously seems like your hating... i mean you named some pretty serious fighters and your celebrating the fact that they have lost... thats pretty low
     
    walk with me, Nov 23, 2008
    walk with me, Nov 23, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 5