Dont you love it when **** boxers are finally exposed?....

By your logic if prime ali faced prime tyson one of them would be **** as one would lose

 

no but hes undefeated or unexposed is the new term

 

his overrating will be exposed

 

as much as i hate khan and enjoyed seeing his chin exposed he is far from a **** boxer!

 

Can't help but laugh at Cotto being exposed, but Pavlik was only "semi-exposed". :rofl

 

From this list only Williams & Pavlik may be legitimately exposed.

Both Calzaghe and Hatton have good and long enough resume
to be called at least shot if they finally lose .... but not exposed.

Haye is difficult because he fights above his natural weight
... he would be exposed if someone smaller (like Toney) outbox
him or even KO.

Dawson is the one who is waitng in the line to be exposed.

 

none of those guys on your list are "****" boxers,
if you want to call someone as **** boxer then zelenoff or eric crumble
would be ok, but these guys are top contenders or world champions.

 

What the FU*K are you on about?

People throw around the word EXPOSED Far FAR to regulary as soon as someone has 1 loss they are exposed! For FU*K sakes people thats the attitude thats killing boxing.

Pavik is exposed because he lost to a legend, who is a skilled defence fighter whos been around the block a few times and knows all the tricks in the game. That doesnt expose Pavlik, get a damn grip. Once guys like Pavlik reach the level they are at they will loose eventually because more often than not they are fighting WORLD CLASS fighters.

Paul Williams? YES he will loose eventually which is why its easy to say "will eventually happen" of course it will as hes now at that level wheres hes fighting Top fighters Top Teams loose games, top fighters will loose the odd fight.

Ricky Hatton..........the guys already fought some top quality opponents Vince Phillips, Michael Stewart, Kostya Tszyu, Luis Collazo, Paul Malignaggi theres no shame in a loss to PBF. He's fighting top fighters.

Antonio Tarver? Come on man, the guys lost 5 times but to the following Eric Harding, Roy Jones Jnr, Glen Johnson, Bernard Hopkins, Chad Dawson theres no shame in that thats not being esposed when two of those guys will be ATG's.

Point is u play with fire u will get burnt. Everytime these top guys fight another top opponent they are playing with fire. And Yes they will get burnt deal with it. In the past a loss wasnt a disaster like it seems to be today. Amir Khan can bounce back, but people have written him off like its all over.

 

Agree with everything you said except the Calzaghe being exposed by Dawson. That will most likely be the other way around.

 

Stupid post. Simple

 

Never heard the term 'semi-exposed' before

 

Just when I thought I'd seen it all on ESB, this clown turns up with possibly the worst post ever.

Ban this lamer and all who follow him!

 

I don't think you should watch boxing anymore, you're clearly not a fan of the sport, and this thread is a joke.

 

What kind of Boxing fan are you?

Slagging off boxers who have lost when you will get KTFO by every single one of them.

Was Ali exposed after his 1st fight with Frazier, or Ray Leonard when he lost to Duran, or when Tyson lost to Douglas, i can name a 100 more ATG who have lost, it doesn't mean they were exposed.

Stop being such a hater when you cant do better.

 

I can't believe you actually took the time to write this diabolical post.