Downplayed riddles : Cassius Clay / Muhammad Ali

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Oct 2, 2011.


  1. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    This is an analysis which goes opponent by opponent over the lesser known facts in the professional career of the self called "The Greatest" :

    Tunney Hunsaker , 1st opponent since the beginning of professional career :
    Olympic champion Ali jabbed his way to a six round shutout in his professional debut against small town police chief Tunney Hunsaker, whose eyes were nearly swollen shut by the end of this bout. Although Hunsaker was never inducted into the Pro Boxing Hall of Fame, he was later inducted into the Law Enforcement Hall of Fame.

    Tony Esperti , 3rd opponent since the beginning of professional career :
    Esperti was on his feet and seemingly not too hurt when referee Mike Kaplan stopped it because Esperti "was beginning to bust up around the eyes." (Miami News)

    Jimmy Robinson , 4th opponent since the beginning of professional career :
    Robinson was a last minute substitute for Willie Gulatt, who failed to appear.


    For some more insight on the beginning of his career , see Il Duce's thread :
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=290216

    Sonny Banks , 1962 :
    ~ Clay was knocked down in the 1st round, Banks was knocked down in the 2nd. ~

    Billy Daniels , 1962 :
    Daniels got cut in the second round which eventually stopped the fight.

    Archie Moore , 1962 :
    Archie Wright was 46 years old by the time they fought , it's less relevant than James Toney stopping Holyfield come 2003 , Lewis KOing Tyson come 2002 or better , Tyson's stoppage losses to Kevin McBride & Danny Williams . This is how credible "The Greatest"'s wins over The "Old Mongoose" is . Clay did not do what Charles , Marchegiano and Patterson could not do before him .

    Doug Jones , 1963 :
    I watched this fight at least 3 times , the first time was on T.V. , and I thought to myself , who is winning the fight , is this the Muhammad Ali everyone regards as the best heavyweight (sometimes fighter) of all time ?
    Jones had Ali hurt early in the fight , and chased him from the beginning until the last bell , Ali never hurt Jones as much .

    Henry Cooper , 1963 & 1966 :
    1) Angelo Dundee , Ali's (then Clay's) trainer cut his glove vs cooper in their first fight in order to buy Ali recovery time after Cooper knocked him down .
    2) Cooper's chin was proven as "below granite" , prior and since their first fight , yet it was not why Ali is listed as the winner against him .
    3) Yet ali went down and received smelling salts
    4) after dundee cut his glove and ali got his smelling salts and glove replaced - Ali won due 2 cuts , against a proven bleeder
    5) Is there anything else I need to know or did not mention about the Cooper fights ?
    possibly .
    At 1966 the story was :
    A bad cut over Cooper's left eye forced stoppage.

    Sonny Liston , 1964 & 1965 :
    Liston's true age is one of the enigmas surrounding these fights .
    In their first fight Ali cut Liston like he did with most of his opponents , and fled away from danger like he almost always did .
    A dive is sometimes mentioned as one of the explanations to the outcome of their second fight .

    Floyd Patterson , 1965 & 1972 :
    Floyd had a crippled back in their first fight and was 37 years old in the second .

    George Chuvalo , 1966 & 1972 :
    Ali was hospitalized after their first fight and peed blood .

    Ernie Terrell , 1967 :
    Ali thumbed Terrell , but failed to stop him nonetheless .

    Jerry Quarry , 1970 & 1972 :
    Ali won twice due to cuts over another undersized proven cutter/bleeder .

    Ken Norton , 1973 (* 2) , 1976 :
    Some say Norton deserved the verdicts all 3 times .
    he grant's thread about Ali vs. Norton #3 :
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78959

    George Foreman , 1974 :
    A thread dedicated for this fight only :
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=211663

    Jimmy Young , 1976 :
    I once read that : " Jimmy Young gave Ali a boxing lesson to end all boxing lessons "

    Earnie Shavers , 1977 :
    Yet another disputed verdict by the judges

    ////
    In my opinion , I believe that immediate rematches with Jones , Cooper , Chuvalo , Terrell , Foreman , Young , Shavers and a 4th match with Norton were much more needed than fighting the likes of Brian London , Karl Mildenberger , Jean Pierre Coopman , Richard Dunn and Alfredo Evangelista .
    Yet he found the time to fight Joe Bugner twice , Alvin Lewis , old and worn Zora Folley and Cleveland Williams , etc .

    ////
    There is yet to be told about Ali's style of fouling , which some insist to consider as boxing .
    Things like holding and hitting behind the head .

    Factoid : did you know that Ali received testosterone injections ? like in steroids . But you only see people people call Toney a roider .
    //
    Enjoy .
     
  2. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    576
    Nov 5, 2009
    Yep, he was a real lucky guy in all those dozens of fights. No chin, no heart, nothing
     
  3. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    No claim regarding luck or resemblance to such a claim in my post high above . Keep fast forwarding , like real men/boxing fans do .
     
  4. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    25
    May 16, 2006
    clowns always make me laugh :lol:
     
  5. junior-soprano

    junior-soprano Active Member Full Member

    1,174
    7
    Aug 1, 2009
    what is you're point ???????????????

    every boxer has his good days his bad days sometimes he get's robbed be the jury or the otherway around.
    sometimes he is very lucky with this or that and sometimes he is very unlucky with this or that.
    statiscally everyone has the same percentage of luck/bad luck and so on and so on.

    or what ?????? oh wait you write when ali fougth patterson and patterson had a bad back that probably never happened before. oh and when ali fought archie moore and moore being so old and past it hmmm that's the first time that happenend in boxing right ??
    oh and ali getting lucky by the jury against norton well we haven't seen that before in any other fight have we ??

    with all respect but this is bull**** thread. and i do not see the point in it.. is it to make ali look not so good or whatever ??
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    All fighters have a lot of trouble with some opponents, and a lucky break or a few here and there.

    I've many times argued in defence of Holyfield, who routinely gets a ton of **** thrown his way for being "inconsistent". But all the great champs had trouble and struggled in some fights.
     
  7. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,073
    1,294
    Jan 1, 2011
    Well frankenfrank, I will actually step forward and commend you for daring to criticize Ali...for many fans, he's simply way beyond criticism, and I find that disturbing. I agree with what I think you're saying, which is that Ali received a lot of breaks in his career. With most fighters it balances out over time....Holmes and ODLH are great examples of that...but guys like Ali and Leonard never had the ball bounce the other way for them. And their opponents were treated unfairly on many occasions.

    Of course Ali did get robbed of his prime by the government, but whilst in the ring, he had all the help in the world.
     
  8. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    576
    Nov 5, 2009
    Nobodies denying his right to critise Ali or any other fighter but some of the names hes posted just dont warrant anything. I mean, he has the 2 fights,for example, against Quarry as 2 wins against a bleeder. So what? How is that controversial. Why even mention Hunsakker? Whats controversial/lucky/got the breaks about that. In fact, theres plenty named on his list that just dont make sense for what hes implying. I cant be arsed going through it all again but if you read it, you'll see what i mean
     
  9. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    I like it how d fact that Ali was out on his seat after he got knocked down by Henry Cooper and received extra recovery time and smelling salts passes undetected and ppl think i m trying 2 portray ali as a lucky fighter .
    Well there was no luck involved in any of d outcomes above . each outcome had its own reasons that i mentioned in detail and i m quite certain that there is more to tell and know than what i posted . but expect d few who know d truth to keep it concealed forever , since telling d truth is revisionism .
    D first post is merely giving d deciding factors in some of his wins that may surprise some .
     
  10. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,073
    1,294
    Jan 1, 2011
    johnmaff36, yes I agree with you that some of the fights in the original post were not controversial. It's not anybody's fault that Quarry was a bit of a bleeder sometimes. There is no shame in stopping a man on cuts. Just ask Lennox Lewis.
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    There is a shame about stopping a man on cuts and not rematching him , unless he was given a long and sustained beating in a 1 sided manner prior to it and d cuts were caused by legit punches , although sometimes there is no need for d fight in 1st place , so 1 might b a little less interested in a rematch . Better financial opportunities r legit excuse as well .

    Or , going by examples , Lewis didn't beat Vitali as good as Byrd did , 2 me , he didn't beat him at all , just proved that he could last 5 rounds with him . Vitali didn't beat Ross Puritty either , but did better than his brother nonetheless . And Chuvalo did a much better job vs both Jones & Quarry than Ali did . 2 me Patterson did better job vs Quarry , Cooper and probably Chuvalo (unless Patterson-Chuvalo was a top 20 greatest robbery of all time) than Ali did . Foreman outdid Ali vs every1 but Jimmy Young .
    Frazier outdid Ali vs Jones and Mathis , but Ali outdid him vs Bonavena (but not vs Foreman) .
    Actually d 1 who did d best vs Quarry was Chuvalo and d 1 who did d best vs Chuvalo was Foreman .

    It just arises another point : Ali rarely outdid any1 of his peers vs mutual opponents . He just wasn't that good / effective .
     
  12. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,073
    1,294
    Jan 1, 2011
    Well man, I admire your courage in saying that, though I fear for your life. But not from me...I think Ali was often not a very interesting guy to watch....way too much holding, dancing, flicking jabs instead of solid jabs, and lack of a finishing punch. He had his spectacular displays, no doubt, but many of his fights I just find very unsatisfying. I like a guy who leaves no question as to who the victor is.
     
  13. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    edit : Sorry , I was confused by Vince Voltage's double post , I was worried about my own post .
    edit #2 : it no longer appears as a double post , so I will reply to him using the edit option :

    if 2 go by my criteria , then All 3 Norton fights and probably d Young fights and also Frazier #2 , Chuvalo #2 were draws (scoring round by round is bad) , but this is not what bothers me the most in regards to Ali .


    What really bothers me the most about his career is the stories (posted in the first post of this thread in short or by links to other threads) behind Cooper #1 , Foreman fights and probably other cases as well that I still don't know enough about .
    These are fights , that under usual circumstances and without the cheats and criminal acts , Ali would have lost them in a brutal fashion .

    How did his performances vs. Doug Jones & Henry Cooper earned him a title shot , is just 1 of many bright like d sun evidence about d weakness of that era (Patterson's & Liston's era / reign ) which can also be called : the post Marchegiano era .
     
  14. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,476
    7,224
    May 18, 2006
    What controversy was there about the Foreman and Cooper fights?

    He was up at 4 against Cooper and had a whopping 10 seconds extra rest between rounds before being clear headed enough to land a fullisade of punches and split Cooper open like a melon in the fifth. All the controversy about it is boxing myth and legend and has been debunked at length by others who could be bothered rehashing boring **** like this again.

    As for the Foreman fight Ali completely outclassed George and all the nonsense about the loose ropes is just a cop out for the fact that Forean fought a dumb fight against a man who was mentally too strong and too skilled for him. Watch the fight, Ali changed his tactics early and went to the ropes, absorbed George's best punches, got inside his head all the while landing at will and George didn't know how to repond.

    As for marking Ali harshly for not beating a fighter as easily as another well that's just ****. Styles make fights and Ali not stopping Patterson as easily as Liston in no way proves Liston was a better overall fighter than Ali, it's just that he was more stylistically suited to finish a smaller,weaker fighter than Ali was.

    I mean by that rationale John Ruiz is better than David Tua because he handled Hasim Rahman better than Tua could despite getting destroyed h2h against Tua.

    It's complete ****ing bull****.
     
  15. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008