drainelo vs. air.....

Lara only landed 10 more punches according to compubox, seems he hit air often also.

 

Sorry but Lara fought a negative fight.

He knew he was facing the cash cow so majority of close rounds would go to canelo, so he should of stepped it up big time. It should be like that, but it is. In light of this i still think he lost the fight.

He 100% won the early rounds, but as the fight went on I just felt he was literally doing nothing. Canelo was forcing the fight, and Lara was running.

I must agree that one score card was way way off and that it was a close fight, But i felt Canelo deserved the win.

My score 115 - 113

 

Landing on the guard still counts as messed punches though, also how can you claim a bad decision if you haven't watched the whole fight yet?

 

ROFL typical progamer. atsch

 

He didn't really outland Canelo though, Canelo was landing a lot of body shots, the rounds were close but with Canelo pushing the action and being more in control in general he took those rounds.

 

PAC lost his fight against staying conscious 3x :rofl

No blue print

 

Yeah, like how Crawford-Gamboa was Cuban schooling also?

You're the same bitchass who discredited Crawford's win over Gamboa when Gamboa got KTFO.

Now your dumbass is back when another Cuban got beat at his own game. LOL.

Alvarez hit Lara to the body so much Lara became TOO SCARED to fight, and winced whenever Canelo dug him to the body.

But you have so much cuban dick up your ass you're too blind to see it.

 

Boxing is not judged on defense and ring generalship and "effective agression". It's judges on how hard you tag the ropes with every other wild hook

 

All that was missing was Lampley's bang ,bang ,bang

 

May i ask if you know the punch stats?

And you are correct about if you outland your opponent you win the fight......In the amateurs.

The fact that you are calling Canelo Drainelo already leads me to believe that you have a negative opinion of him, so of course you are going to say Lara won.

Are you saying the fight wasn't a close fight, and that that all rounds were easy to score?

Judging a fight comes down to an OPINION, way more than "who landed the most punches" i feel Canelo nicked it by 2 rounds, but can see an argument for Lara winning, where as your bias seems to have blinded you to the point that you think what you are saying is a fact.

The only fact is that the judges were of the OPINION that Canelo was the winner, and Lara the loser, and you seem to be having trouble coming to terms with that

Try to keep your arguments level headed and unbiased, or i will find someone more intelligent to discuss the fight with.

 

Drainelo?, please don't post anymore

 

First off.....I don't buy them punch stats.


I stayed up til 4 in AM reviewing and by rd 5, Lara had outlanded him 68-32. Even a few of Canelos "CLEAR" landed shots werent counted, and I think they didnt count them on purpose, just to hide the appearance of biasedness. :think

Now, fukk the stats anyways...power shots count more than jabs.....but Lara's L hand counts every bit as much as Canelo's Lhook to body.

I had already scored 22 power shots landed by Lara by rd 5. Canelo had 28 landing only 4 jabs.

Lara's defense was not judged properly, nor was his own effective aggression. He led more often than he countered, and his defense was beautiful at times, right in the pocket one second, and 5 feet to Nelos L a split second later as Canelo is banging his L hook off the ropes.

It was clear that Levi Martinez was either watching a different fight, or KNEW to score aggression over the effective aggression and defense and ring generalship from the opening bell.:rofl