DUCKman is a joke.

Daniel Londas was a great win for getting his first title..he was 14-1 in his last 15 fights and his lone loss was controversial...

Raul Perez was also a very good win

also fought Jorge Ramirez and Jimmy Garcia back to back and took W's over both..both were better than decent wins but not great wins..

Carlos Gerena and Carlos Hernandez were both top 10 when hernandez whooped on em both too...

not a bad resume really..not atg status but mos def a very good resume with alot of CONSISTENCY!

 

see..proved your point wrong and you still trying:rofl stop luke...:nono

 

Answer the question.

 

Kinda like trying to pump up Clottey like *******s pumped up David Diaz.:roll:

 

No they didn't.

No one gave pacquiao credit for diaz.
I remember people claiming that pacquaio didn't even look good in that fight.

 

I CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION BUT IT WONT CHANGE THE FACT THAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT A FIGHTER U CLEARLY DONT KNOW THE FACTS AROUND...

U DIDN'T EVEN READ WHAT I WROTE BEFORE ANSWERING WHEN YOU MENTIONED OSCAR...

HERNANDEZ IS HOF WORTHY, YES...AND NO NOT EVERYONE FLOYD HAS FOUGHT IS HOF WORTHY..HERNANDEZ AND HIS CONSISTENCY ALONG WITH HIS AWESOME RECORD AND THE FACT THAT HE CONSISTENTLY FOUGHT TOP 10 COMPETITION AT 130 AND DOMINATED THEM MOST OF THE TIME IS ENOUGH FOR ME TO PUT HIM IN THE HOF BY MY BOOK..

NOW BACK TO YOU GETTING OWNED WITH FALSE INFO U TRIED TO POST:think

 

Now you want me to post genaro's resume?????

 

WHAT FIGHT U WATCHING?? EVERYONE GAVE MANNY CREDIT FOR THAT FIGHT...EVEN I DIDN'T EXPECT WHAT I SAW...I THOUGHT HED BEAT UP ON HIM FOR 12 ROUNDS..NOT MAKE HIM QUIT...MANNY LOOKED BETTER AGAINST DIAZ THAN HE DID LAST NIGHT AGAINST CLOTTEY I CAN TELL U THAT MUCH TOO...WOULD HATE TO SEE FLOYD COUNTER THE **** OUT OF MANNY WHEN CLOTTEY HAD AN EASY ENOUGH TIME DOING IT WHEN HE WOULD LET HIS HANDS GO..PROBLEM WAS HE WOULDN'T LET HIS HANDS GO..:hi::bbb

 

NO MAN NEVERMIND LUKE..I ALREADY KNOW GENARO'S RESUME...I POSTED SOME GOOD WINS OF HIS...AGAIN...HE WAS A 130LB FIGHTER THAT CONSISTENTLY FOUGHT TOP 10 GUYS IN HIS DIVISION...HE WASN'T THE TYPE OF FIGHTER THAT MOVED UP IN WEIGHT TO GET CHAMPIONSHIPS..HE DID IT ONCE AND FOUND 135 WAS NOT HIS THING...HE WAS A DIFFERENT FIGHTER AND NOT ONLY THAT HIS 2 LOSSES WERE BOTH TO FUTURE HOF FIGHTERS AND TOP 50 ATGS...:deal

 

You're basically saying every fighter who won some matches is HOF worthy.

You didn't even pay attention to genaro until he fought floyd, admit it.

 

STILL IGNORING HOW U GOT OWNED WITH FACTS LUKE...U DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THAT HE FOUGHT OSCAR ABOVE 130...HOW CAN I DEBATE WITH YOU WHEN YOU SHOWED U DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT ALREADY? UR MISLEAD WITH WRONG INFO..CANT ARGUE WITH YOU..U DONT HAVE THE RIGHT INFO ON THIS ONE..

GO DO SOME RESEARCH ON GENARO INSTEAD OF JUST LOOKING AT HIM AS A LESS QUALITY FIGHTER "CUZ FLOYD FOUGHT HIM"..THAN COME BACK TO THE ARGUMENT WHEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT INFORMATION TO HAVE A DEBATE:thumbsup

 

:rofl:good

 

Owned by what?
Your claim that genaro hernadez is worthy of being in the boxing hall of fame?

I disagree.

 

HUH..LOL...I SAW GENARO FIGHT AT THE GREAT WESTERN FORUM WHEN I WAS A KID MAN..

LMFAO..BEFORE FLOYD WAS EVEN A PRO...SAW HIM FIGHT RAMIREZ THEIR MAN:good:hi:

 

Look guys, you should think of this. Dont support floyd and drug testing or pac with his innocence and charisma. I don't like either fighter
but i know the importance of this event. My question to you is:

Dont you wanna see who really is the best boxer of this generation???

I know i do, i dont support floyd, in fact, i hate him but i just want to see who is the best without any unfair advantages.

The only way to make sure of that is olympic drug testing