i think in the later stages he meant paulie wasn't causing khan problems such as big problems. in the earlier rounds it was more of khan having to find his way, and he found paulie's style awkward. eventually khan broke him down. duke said it was a good performance from amir, but not spectacular. i agreed with that aswell. i haven't got too many complaints. i've heard worse put it that way.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2003/jul/12/boxing.comment Duke McKenzie on Lennox Lewis: McKenzie: "He just doesn't do it for me. He's lost to run-of-the-mill guys, and now his legs have gone. His defence is not great and his jab's over-rated but he gets away with it because he hits hard."
Its funny how it took him to commentate on an Amir Khan fight, one in which he was pretty much the only pundit to give a round to Paulie, for you to make a thread of how bad he is