Duran .Vs. Palomino 1977

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Jan 31, 2009.


  1. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Was Carlos Palomino at the end of his career when he lost to Benitez & Duran? What if Duran had challenged "King Carlos" in 1977? In the middle of Palomino's prime. Would the result have been different?
     
  2. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    Duran was still a lightweight in 1977 so he would have been giving up too much in weight to beat Palomino at that stage of his career.

    If however you are speaking of a hypothetical matchup between the Palomino of 1977 vs the Duran of 1979 then I think Duran would have gotten the decision.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,025
    18,289
    Jul 29, 2004
    Im not so sure Palomino had slid that far in those fights from his best..he still looked pretty capable.

    The level of dominance that Roberto showed in that fight in all aspects makes me think Carlos would never have an answer for him.
    Roberto was no less a monster in 77, though that period when he fought Palomino, Leonard, Brooks and DeJesus for the third time is about the best I have ever seen him.

    The result would not have changed..at best it would have been closer.
     
  4. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,606
    1,076
    Feb 19, 2006
    Agreed.
     
  5. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Palomino was still in his prime for the Benitez and Duran fights.He's one of those rare fighters that retired while more or less still at the top of his game.
     
  6. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    Good posts, Rise Above and WhataRock :good
     
  7. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    15
    Dec 27, 2006
    Palomino was very good fighter, duran was a very GREAT fighter. Duran was just too naturally talented for palomino, who didn't possess one single trait that could offset duran. He was mechanical in comparison and it showed in their fight. Durans ability to feint and slip punches was phenominal.
     
  8. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Yes good post. This could be true, however Palomino did have over 10 title defenses & two wars with Armando Muniz. He still looked good in losing efforts with Benitez & Duran. But he still could have been slipping a little bit.
     
  9. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Yeah he probably would have started to noticeably drop off a 2 or 3 years after losing to Duran if he kept up his schedule up. but a lot of those defences other than the Muniz bouts, were easy ones against poor competition.

    Palomino was very good, but more thana nything else just didn't have that slight something extra to beat fighters like Benitez or Duran.He did give it an excellent effort against Wilfred however.Benitez had a poor night offensively in that fight.